Some argue younger are not suitable for important positions in the government, while others think this is a good idea. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Leading a government is the key to the advancement of any nation. Because of this, it is believed that these imperative aspects should be established by senior aides, while others state that the young stand a good chance of being a governor. Both viewpoints are justifiable, but I personally lean towards the former school of thought.
On the one hand, it is irrefutable that young people play a pivotal role in national development. As a matter of fact, having approached to the evolved principles, youngsters are likely to exert a multitude of creative and novel ideas to the government issues. For instances, with energy, knowledge and enthusiasm, the young administrators of Canada have received much praise from the public for successfully pushed to increase HIV understanding and dispel stigmas attached to the disease. Additionally, regarding to a robust and youthful factors, they might completely adapt for the physical stamina owing to the nature of work such as frequent movement, high concentration state, among others.
Despite the aforementioned positive side, a majority of youngsters may be inadequate in the criterion of a leader. Albeit their dynamic factors, this group is obviously suffering from a shortage of empirical experience which is a prerequisite for political positions. Particularly, compared with the elderly, age immaturity restricts young leaders in response to experience abundance as well as the variety of dangers in making any decisions with a nation. These deficiencies could spell trouble for them to remedy government missions. For these reasons, they should hone practical skills and cultivate relevant job skills prior to being responsible for an integral and decisive role of a community.
I strongly subscribe to the statement that younger might not be delegated to high-ranking posts in governmental administration. To be an administrator, not only do the young acquire various preliminary requirements but they also need to be equipped with the charismatic leading skills in order to take exhaustive control of a country. Under those harsh conditions, they would gradually enrich to a certain age.
In conclusion, even though appreciating the merits of having a young governor, I would be of opinion that they are not compatible with vital posts in political hierarchy.
- The line graph below provide information about the incomes of four restaurants in a city in 2010 84
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled tea and pineapples in 2010 and 2015 in five European countries 78
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 78
- The graph below shows the spending on research into renewable sources of energy in four countries between 1975 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The charts below show the number of working hours per week in industrial sector in four European countries in 2002 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons with relevant 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 701, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...egral and decisive role of a community. I strongly subscribe to the statement th...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, regarding, so, thus, well, while, as to, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a matter of fact, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1969.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 362.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43922651934 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18581113226 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 176.041082164 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60773480663 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 620.1 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.2493392369 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.0625 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.625 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.125 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124162155649 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0379034178007 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0291670653482 0.0667982634062 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0640928316477 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0399083682932 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.4 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 130.0 78.4519038076 166% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.