Some British families decide not to buy televisions because they influence the development of the creativity of children. What do you think?
With the rapid development of science and technology, television, as a new invention in the 20th century is becoming very populous in people’s life. People can be informed of the latest news and enjoy the colorful programs at home. In my opinion, television will not affect children’s creativity as exaggerated.
Firstly, television is the most effective tool to inform children of the latest news and scientific development over the world. Television tells us the recent development of some researches, such as clone technology, Genetic breakthroughs, the new computing technology and so on, which can stimulate the imagination of children and encourage them to carry out relevant experiments, making new findings and breakthroughs in their study.
Secondly, some programs like adventures and geography can enlarge children’s knowledge of scope. With the emerge of information technology, the knowledge in textbooks cannot satisfy children’s curiosity any more. Children need to learn wider knowledge and know more about our world. Programs like adventures can cultivate children’s creativity and the ability to tackle difficulty; programs like geography can teach children knowledge about different countries in the world and initiate their aspiration to know about the nature; programs about science can inspire children’s interest in science and technology.
However, the improper programs on television sometimes play negative role in the growth of children. The shots about violence, crimes and pornography contents are making children walk on the criminal road.
To sum up, I believe that television will not influence children’s creativity. But meanwhile, the government and the whole society should do their utmost to prohibit the unhealthy contents on TV and provide the children with a clean growing environment
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-06-27 | duylinh87 | 78 | view |
| 2017-06-01 | jasonlau0913 | 78 | view |
- Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information, such as their hobbies and interests, and whether they are married or single. Some people say that this information may be relevant and useful. Others disagree.Discuss both these vi 73
- Some British families decide not to buy televisions because they influence the development of the creativity of children. What do you think? 78
- Some people say that it is possible to tell a lot about a person's culture and character from their choice of clothes.Do you agree or disagree? 56
- Some people say that it is possible to tell a lot about a person s culture and character from their choice of clothes Do you agree or disagree 78
- Intelligent machines such as robots are widely applied to take the place of human beings. Please discuss the advantages and disadvantages. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 72, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'invention'.
Suggestion: invention
...cience and technology, television, as a new invention in the 20th century is becoming very po...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ings and breakthroughs in their study. Secondly, some programs like adventures ...
^^^
Line 5, column 108, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...hildren's knowledge of scope. With the emerge of information technology, the knowledg...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 258, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hildren with a clean growing environment
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, while, such as, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1599.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.85714285714 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29006657976 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.567765567766 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 82.318834616 49.4020404114 167% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.0 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.38461538462 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173844962251 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0727826146154 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0426079246516 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105324617413 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0240821720703 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.71 12.4159519038 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.