Some businesses find that new employees who just finished their education lack basic interpersonal ability such as working with other employees as a team. What do you think are the causes and what solutions can you suggest?
Nowadays, some enterprises realize that new employees who have just graduated lack basic interpersonal ability such as teamworking skills. There are several reasons as well as some suggested solutions for this phenomenon.
The first reason is that formal degrees are preferably evaluated by employers during recruitment process. Hence, during the time at university, many students try to gain two or three degrees at the expense of interpersonal skills in order to ensure that their future careers are guaranteed, which means those skills are restricted to school settings and libraries. For instance, instead of hanging out with friends to release stress, many students jusst focus on their study and they are ill-equipped with other skills, especially interpersonal abilities when they become new employees. The second reason is that many students, especially students who move from rural areas to cities, often have to do part-time jobs to pay for their tuition fees. Thus, they do not have a chance to develop teamworking skills since they are too busy with their study and work.
However, there are some methods that can be employed to adress this problem. First of all, universities should often promote team orientation by encouraging collective efforts among students. This means that lecturers should be flexible in creating chance for students to work in a team. To illustrate, lecturers can let students do some projects on different topics such as environment, traffic,etc. together. Therefore, students will have an opportunity to discuss those topics with each other and enhance teamworking skills. Moreover, government should introduce a policy that help students from remote areas to have more time to attend projects and extracurricular activities. To exemplify, government can support those students with finance to assist those students.
In conclusion, there are a hosts of reasons why new employees have a tendency to lack basic interpersonal abilities. However, there are also some methods that can be employed in terms of introductions of new polity and the promotion of team orientation in universities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-13 | Lê Khánh Diệp | 84 | view |
| 2022-08-11 | Lê Khánh Diệp | 56 | view |
- Many developing countries are currently expanding their tourist industries Why is this the case Is it a positive development 84
- At many companies today applicants are often rejected due to old age Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 78
- Some businesses find that new employees who just finished their education lack basic interpersonal ability such as working with other employees as a team What do you think are the causes and what solutions can you suggest 84
- Some think that it is more important for children to engage in outdoor activities instead of playing videogames 73
- Some people find advertisements amusing or annoying and they are not influenced by this when they shop To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 396, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , etc
...rent topics such as environment, traffic,etc. together. Therefore, students will hav...
^^^^
Line 7, column 26, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a host' or simply 'hosts'?
Suggestion: a host; hosts
...e students. In conclusion, there are a hosts of reasons why new employees have a ten...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, however, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, thus, well, as to, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1808.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49544072948 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94926504091 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544072948328 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 552.6 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7888830561 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.0 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5625 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.1875 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241944655779 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0813797267732 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0708571614342 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175400621909 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0750202078149 0.056905535591 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.