Some children can learn more efficiently by watching tv. Therefore, children should watch tv regularly both in school and at home. Do you agree or disagree?
People believe that TV exposure can bring advantages for their study so they should encourage watching TV frequently both in school and at home. Personally, I partly agree with this idea
On the one hand, there are benefits when children watch TV. Firstly, educational channels on TV like Discovery, the history channel and especially PBS allow kids to dig deeper insight into other cultures, lifestyle and values from pasts of the world. This helps them avoid culture shock or other culture-related problems when they study in foreign country or travel. Furthermore, watching TV regularly creates a favourable condition for children to get access to a reservoir of knowledge. They can learn some language or another useful thing by watching, assisting them to boost their knowledge and make them more aware of the world around them, which is important in their lives future
On the other hand, it is obvious that watching TV has several detrimental impacts on physical and mental health. As we can see that if children spend more time on exposing TV screen, they can be more likely to suffer from health problems such as obesity and short-sightedness associated with sedentary lifestyle. Moreover, spending too much time on watching TV means that they do not have much time on social activities. This leads to isolating people and discouraging real world. In addition to this, some today’s TV programs contains violent and obscene contents. If children expose heavily to those programmes, they tend to emulate and become more aggressive in their adulthood
In conclusion, while it is supported by some that kids should watch TV regularly because it gives them a chance to be more effective study, I think that the negative influences can be seen in this trend
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-14 | NSMDeadshot0411 | 84 | view |
| 2020-08-18 | longpm2k | 73 | view |
| 2020-02-27 | thiên định | 84 | view |
| 2019-04-29 | phanduydat | 82 | view |
| 2018-01-08 | BUITUYET | 86 | view |
- the bar chart show the distribution of employment among agriculture services and industries in three countries in 1980 and projected distribution in 2020 67
- the graph below shows the percentage of population in cities since 1970s with projection to 2030
- the diagram below show how tomato ketchup is made 84
- Task2 5 3 2020 some people argue that job satisfaction is more important than job security while other believe that they cannot always expecct kob satisfaction and a permanent job is more important Discuss both these views and givr your oppinion 61
- The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should spend about 20 minutes on this task 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 162, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ry channel and especially PBS allow kids to dig deeper insight into other culture...
^^
Line 2, column 227, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nto other cultures, lifestyle and values from pasts of the world. This helps them...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, so, while, i think, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1478.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09655172414 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75219078231 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61724137931 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 83.0983684736 49.4020404114 168% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.363636364 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3636363636 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6363636364 7.06120827912 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.389515858151 0.244688304435 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142265736759 0.084324248473 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0982257935014 0.0667982634062 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.239733767605 0.151304729494 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.040056608398 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 50.2224549098 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.