Nowadays, the usage of cell phones is quite a progressive trend throughout the world. Many people, especially, youngsters use their phones on a daily basis. In my opinion, results from social media platforms have the ability to keep the attention of users. It should be viewed as a negative development due to harm to the health of children.
To begin with, social media is a good source of entertainment to hold attention for a long time. this means it is difficult to divert their focus from smartphones because this entertainment platform can offer varieties of content related to their juvenile interests, such as watching cartoons as well as playing games. Youtube, for example, presents various kid's channels, especially cartoons that give moral lessons and poems for children and it is also hard to put down the mobile aside. Consequently, children lack the self-control to avoid wasting precious time on their phones.
However, spending too much time on a mobile screen tends to harmful impact on their children's health as well as their minds.
they watch obnoxious content which is unpleasant for their mental health. In addition, blue rays come from the screen of mobile which has a bad effect on the sensitive retina of children. For instance, 80 percent of children wear precautionary glasses because excessive use of mobile gadgets leads to becoming short-sighted. In short, addiction to smartphones has many unhealthy repercussions for children.
To sum up, some teenagers a large amount of time use mobile in every day because social media's content has to fail to divert attention from it. sadly to say, it can indulge in mental disorders and health issues as well.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 98, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...ment to hold attention for a long time. this means it is difficult to divert their f...
^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...ildrens health as well as their minds. they watch obnoxious content which is unplea...
^^^^
Line 8, column 61, Rule ID: ANINFOR_EVERY_DAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'in everyday'?
Suggestion: in everyday
...agers a large amount of time use mobile in every day because social medias content has to fa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, however, if, so, well, as to, for example, for instance, in addition, in short, such as, as well as, in my opinion, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1415.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1268115942 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79583163713 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.590579710145 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 422.1 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.7090489531 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.3333333333 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6666666667 7.06120827912 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18115807608 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0549484122133 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.051638957812 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0954152559858 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0279683920208 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.