Recently, most children are glued on their smartphones each day for hours. This essay will explain the contributing factor and to what extent this could be a negative or positive for children development.
Regarding the reason, this phenomenon can be caused by the busy parents who do not have enough quality time to play with their children. The parents usually spent eight hours even more at their office every day. Hence, they are frequently exhausted and have no energy to interact with their children. Therefore, they choose smartphones as tools to keep their children occupied.
In my point of view, this rising problem will lead to negative effects on children’s development. Children between 5-10 years old need parents’ supervision. On that period of age, children can not filter any content that can be accessed through their mobile phones. It is frequently reported that children accidentally access any bad contents and websites that can cause trauma (if they see any horor contents) or even trigger them to do something they should not do like pickpocketing, lying, cursing etc. Furthermore, spending hours on mobile phones will drive children to a sedentary life style which characterized by less motoric activities. This can be dangerous, because in that golden period of development children need activities that can train their muscles and bones in order to support their growth.
In conclusion, less control from parents will increase the risk of smartphones addiction which is related to several negative impacts on children’s development such as bad behaviours and becoming less active
- The percentage of people using various mobile phone features 89
- The chart shows the depth of snow cm in a particular resort in Canada in three individual years 73
- The bar chart below shows the number of students in three different courses from 2001 2004 Identify the main trends and summarize the data 73
- Topic The diagram below shows the stages and equipment used in the cement making process and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes
- Task 1 The table below shows the percentage of the population by age groups in one town who rode bicycles in 2011 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, hence, if, regarding, so, therefore, as to, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1366.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3568627451 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80318377788 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.611764705882 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 400.5 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.4910812374 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.076923077 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6153846154 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46153846154 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334032150824 0.244688304435 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120663536831 0.084324248473 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0525487599758 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205017112852 0.151304729494 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.067730382933 0.056905535591 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.