A glance at the provided bar chart shows the length of time spent in years at school by adults both female and male on average from 2000 to 2020 while the circular charts illustrate the latest education background of adults in 2000 and 2010 in Singapore.
In general, it is clearly apparent that male spent more years at school than women. In addition, there were an increase in the proportion of higher education qualification in 2010 while the other qualifications showed the opposite.
Looking in more detail from the bar chart, in two decades, adults male spent more years on average compared to female. Furthermore the figures showed an upward trend which started at 9 years in 2000 to around 12 years in 2020. Meanwhile, the length of years of female participation slightly fluctuated at 8 to 9 years.
Regarding the pie charts, in a decade, the proportion of adults who qualified with master and bachelor degree rose significantly by around four folds from 7.5 and 8.3 to 30.31 and 32.93 respectively. On the other hand, the number of high school and secondary school qualified adults reported to decrease considerably by approximately 11 to 12. Moreover, the primary school qualification extremely declined from 25.77 to only 2.1 in the end of the period given.
- It is difficult for people in the cities to get enough physical exercise What are the causes and solution 73
- Many manufactured food and drink products contain high levels of sugar which causes many health problems Sugary products should be made more expensive to encourage people to consume less sugar Do you agree or disagree 67
- The table below summarises some data collected by a college bookshop for the month of February 2000 73
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 61
- The table below gives information about UK independent films 73
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 120, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...re years on average compared to female. Furthermore the figures showed an upward trend whic...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, look, moreover, regarding, second, while, in addition, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1065.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97663551402 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83144025033 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556074766355 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 315.0 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.9973883485 43.030603864 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.333333333 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7777777778 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2222222222 5.23603664747 214% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235491249028 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0880323930331 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.088955559177 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151297222689 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0943050558027 0.0819641961636 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 120, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...re years on average compared to female. Furthermore the figures showed an upward trend whic...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, look, moreover, regarding, second, while, in addition, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1065.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97663551402 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83144025033 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556074766355 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 315.0 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.9973883485 43.030603864 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.333333333 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7777777778 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2222222222 5.23603664747 214% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235491249028 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0880323930331 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.088955559177 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151297222689 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0943050558027 0.0819641961636 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.