Some cities have few controls over the design and construction of housing and office buildings. People think that they should be free to choose the design they like. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
The demand of accomodation and work office is associated with economic development, thus how are these buildings designed is questionable. Although some people think that the design should be freely chosen and follow their style, I believe this trend would be eclipsed by its considerable drawbacks.
On the other hand, less oversight of building design may bring about a ton of benefits. First, with the freedom in construction, the owners and designers would seize the opportunities in experiencing various design styles as well as materials and come up with new or even novel ideas, which leads to the arrival of unique and innovative houses. Furthermore, apartments are designed freely toward the owners' perspectives would match various demands. Each person has their own preference, some of them may be passionate about traditional forms while the others enjoy modern ones. Therefore loose regulation on the design and construction is obviously advantageous.
On the other hand, the disadvantages of this trend are more significant. If the buildings are constructed without any strict or uniform building codes, the consequences will be serious when natural disasters strike. A typical example could be seen in the central area of Vietnam. There are many houses that completely collapse whenever fierce storm strikes the regions and claims residents’ life or property. Secondly, failing in uniformity and adjustment of the city may result in distortion in city arrangement and organization. This may , in turn, damage the look of the city since the consistency in the building is associated with beauty.
In conclusion, Despite load of positive effects of allowing people design their houses basing on styles, these advantages are overshadowed by the drawbacks
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-03-17 | PhamDung0501 | 67 | view |
| 2021-11-17 | Kien Vu | 84 | view |
| 2021-11-17 | Kien Vu | 56 | view |
| 2021-10-17 | rajpatel90 | 73 | view |
| 2020-06-10 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 84 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 315, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...vel ideas, which leads to the arrival of unique and innovative houses. Furthermor...
^^
Line 3, column 359, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ique and innovative houses. Furthermore, apartments are designed freely toward t...
^^
Line 3, column 391, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hermore, apartments are designed freely toward the owners perspectives would mat...
^^
Line 3, column 582, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...rms while the others enjoy modern ones. Therefore loose regulation on the design and cons...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 177, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...building codes, the consequences will be serious when natural disasters strike. ...
^^
Line 5, column 329, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...are many houses that completely collapse whenever fierce storm strikes the region...
^^
Line 5, column 543, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...y arrangement and organization. This may , in turn, damage the look of the city si...
^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e building is associated with beauty. In conclusion, Despite load of positive ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, while, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1504.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48905109489 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01566159839 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631386861314 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.6349260376 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.428571429 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5714285714 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.35714285714 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257792326338 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0778261891381 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0460913954885 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150752175081 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0448060395966 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.