some cities have vehicle-free days, when private cars, trucks, motorcycles are banned in the city centre. Public transportations like buses, taxis, and metros are advised. To what extent do you think the advantages outweight the disadvantages?
It is true that some densely populated city should have a law about banning private vehicle such as cars, trucks, motorcycles not allow to enter the city centre on rush time, and public transportations like buses, taxis and metros are advised. While this trend has some benefits, I would argue that there are far more drawbacks.
On the one hand, some population cities should have a law about banning private vehicle has some certain advantages. Firstly, some advantage of this law is limitation number of vehicle moving in the city. Therefore, the traffic jam during a rush time would be solves, and people can move faster. For example, in Ho Chi Minh city, it takes 30 munites to travel from Thu Duc District to district 1, but if the city applies this law, it could be 10 to 15 munites. In addition, the problem of traffic accidents is also significant reduced. Secondly, fewer vehicle on the stress also have less exhaust emission, so it will have less air pollution. Therefore, the environment in the city become more and more unblemished.
On the other hand, this law also have more drawbacks. Firstly, it is inconvenienced to the private who regularly use private vehicle to travel around the city such as businessman, grap, Uber.. For instance, in Ho Chi Minh city, most of the other foreigners who just travel by taxis or grap, so if we have this law, other foreigners will not have means to travel in the city. Seondly, it also create difficult for fast delivery services in the city. It could be caused increasing cost of delivery in the city centre.
In conclusion, although I regconize the possible positive effects of some population in city should have a law about banning private vehicle, it seems to me that the advantages outweight the disadvantages.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-03 | mainganha0912 | 73 | view |
| 2018-04-11 | CATVY | 61 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
It is true that some densely populated c...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 151, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'entering'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: entering
... as cars, trucks, motorcycles not allow to enter the city centre on rush time, and publi...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gue that there are far more drawbacks. On the one hand, some population cities ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ity become more and more unblemished. On the other hand, this law also have mo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 205, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...the city such as businessman, grap, Uber.. For instance, in Ho Chi Minh city, most...
^^
Line 3, column 407, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'creates'?
Suggestion: creates
...to travel in the city. Seondly, it also create difficult for fast delivery services i...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 441, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... also create difficult for fast delivery services in the city. It could be caused...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g cost of delivery in the city centre. In conclusion, although I regconize the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1469.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83223684211 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67561632103 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.516447368421 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 475.2 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.1517502492 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.9333333333 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2666666667 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9333333333 7.06120827912 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282108574252 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0945638259062 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106741430328 0.0667982634062 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203998126598 0.151304729494 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0938033641548 0.056905535591 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.