In this day and age, there is still discrimination between the sexes. While it seems proper to a certain extent that women are more aggressive than men owing to the fact that a number of people who are always stood by the side of women, I firmly believe that men are more competitive than women due to some reasons that I will mention in this essay.
First and foremost, Women have inherent biological duties that are unique to them, which render them unable to compete as frequently as men. For instance, some research proved that the health of a woman seems to be always not as strong as a man to do heavy work every often. Therefore, in the work environment, the leaders always divide the work for women are usually lighter than men.
Furthermore, women simply have various outlets for their competitive qualities. Take the example for this opinion, women often have many ways to deal with the problem together without competing with each other. They can reconcile and know how to balance the tasks. This can be said because of their characteristic: more tolerant than men and not as impatient or violent as men. Thus, men are genetically more aggressive than women.
As shown above, women really less competitive than men and a number of studies have shown that. Besides, contemporary society has witnessed modern women rapidly progressing in professional and personal spheres. Because of that, governments seem to always update the policy about equality to ensure that women are not disadvantaged in this modern society.
- The bar chart below describes some changes about the percentage of people were born in Australia and who were born outside Australia living in urban rural and town between 1995 and 2010
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000 78
- Some people think personal happiness is closely related to economic success while others believe that it depends on other factors Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- The maps below show the changes that have taken place in the waterfront area of a town called Darwin between 2009 and 2014 73
- The diagram shows the life cycle of a frog 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, furthermore, really, so, still, therefore, thus, while, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1277.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9496124031 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61967623257 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.577519379845 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 411.3 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.7271459246 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.2307692308 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8461538462 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46153846154 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29985292541 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104866623231 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0951723985023 0.0667982634062 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187773684085 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0628524220878 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.