Some countries achieve international sporting success by building specialized facilities for training top athletes instead of providing sports facilities that everyone can use. Do you think it is a positive or negative development?
Nowadays, some countries invest an immense amount of money on special sports facilities for the training of their top talents to achieve sports success in some international competitions. While such development is worth rewarding, I would disapprove if it is at the expense of the public sports facilities.
On the one hand, I accept that supporting athletes in international games is beneficial in multiple ways. For many people, global sports games such as the World Cup or the Olympic are when the sense of partialism and national consolidation is shared the most. The winners become national heroes, and they strongly influence other people to learn and practice sports.
On the other hand, I strongly argue that the public sport system should be the top priority. It is no doubt that the citizens are those who pay taxes and contribute to the government budget, thus, they should be all beneficial from government spending. There is no right for the government to cut the expense for the public sport system and use that to fund the international sports games.
In addition, the lack of investment in public sports facilities would contribute to a number of social issues. There would be a slide in public health and longevity among the poor who can not afford the private sport system. As a result, these poor old patients become a burden to the domestic economy and national medical system.
To conclude, international sporting success is a great honor, which is the reason why more nations put money into highly professional sports facilities to cultivate their top talents. However, I believe that all governments should always put the public sport system first.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-09-04 | Đào Nguyễn Hạnh Nguyên | 56 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 331, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ic economy and national medical system. To conclude, international sporting succ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, thus, while, in addition, no doubt, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1400.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07246376812 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76722422848 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539855072464 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 427.5 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.9094502891 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.692307692 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2307692308 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30890263791 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108344447936 0.084324248473 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109798243375 0.0667982634062 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178225351739 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10696479526 0.056905535591 188% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.