In some countries the average weight of people is increasing and their levels of health and fitness are decreasing.What do you think are the causes of these problems and what measures could be taken to solve them?

Buildings are the structures built for the purpose of dwelling or for running any business activities.
In antique, specifically during hunting age, caverns were the dominant structures. However, with the industrial revolution, RCC technology is being used for the construction of edifices. These buildings differ not only in materials used but also with layouts. Some are skyscrapers while others are horizontal.
Horizontals buildings are structures positioned side by side parallel to the ground. These structures are safe from disaster likely earthquake. Furthermore such constructions reduce the expenses on installations of elevators or staircases. Horizontal buildings occupy large space limiting land territory for other purposes which is its principal disadvantage. Moreover, the inhabitants of fewer storeys are likely to be affected more by pollutions.
The structures raised from the horizon and having different levels namely bottom, middle and top are termed as vertical buildings. such edifices reduce covering on land allowing many people reside in them. Sighting seeing from such altitudinous structures provides spectacular views .In its downside, such constructions are highly prone to destructions during the time of disasters. This fact is attested by the deaths toll of 25 people when hit by earthquake of 7.6 magnitudes in 2015AD. Scientifically speaking, higher the altitude lower is the air pressuring, making pupil difficulty in respiration.
In a nutshell, both kinds of buildings outweigh each other in fewer aspects highlighting their importance. The government should put emphasis on both of these kinds in its developmental planning

Votes
Average: 1.1 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
IELTS Writing Task II - IELTS Academic

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 144, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...e safe from disaster likely earthquake. Furthermore such constructions reduce the expenses ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 402, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...reover, the inhabitants of fewer storeys are likely to be affected more by pollut...
^^^
Line 4, column 132, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Such
...d top are termed as vertical buildings. such edifices reduce covering on land allow...
^^^^
Line 4, column 152, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...vertical buildings. such edifices reduce covering on land allowing many people re...
^^
Line 4, column 284, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...us structures provides spectacular views .In its downside, such constructions are ...
^^
Line 4, column 286, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
... structures provides spectacular views .In its downside, such constructions are hi...
^^
Line 4, column 606, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...making pupil difficulty in respiration. In a nutshell, both kinds of buildings o...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, well, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1426.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 244.0 315.596192385 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.84426229508 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17944047109 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.668032786885 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.4465138857 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 83.8823529412 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.3529411765 20.7667163134 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.64705882353 7.06120827912 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0668614526852 0.244688304435 27% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.021493326309 0.084324248473 25% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0199385671893 0.0667982634062 30% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0323877898816 0.151304729494 21% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0180146960028 0.056905535591 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.34 50.2224549098 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.0 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.96 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.