In some countries, the government has tried to reduce traffic. For instance, they imposed a congestion tax during rush hour. Do you think the development is positive or negative ?

Essay topics:

In some countries, the government has tried to reduce traffic. For instance, they imposed a congestion tax during rush hour. Do you think the development is positive or negative ?

Although traffic jam is not considered to be so new a subject for discussion, but there still remains concern that is expressed over such an issue. In particular, some hold an opinion that giving high rate tax during peak hours is the key to solve this problem, and this should be acknowledged as a good way. This way, to my way of thinking, can be reasonable to some extent, but it has drawbacks too.

Indeed, those who choose to be all in favor of the solution mentioned earlier, for definite, can give pieces of evidence and reasons. An undeniable fact is that most people prefer to use private vehicles, and what’s more, there are not enough parking facilities for all owners. Consequently, imposing the congestion charge may discourage people from using their own vehicles, which reduces a great number of cars and motorbikes. As a result, traffic congestion will be eased and it will have a positive impact on the environment. In addition, the government can collect plenty of money and invest into transportation infrastructure such as railways, high ways or mass transit. Thus, it benefits not only the government but also the citizens.

On the contrary, this solution will have a bad influence on people whose public transportation system of their country is underdeveloped. Especially, developing nations like Vietnam, Lao, Cambodia,… can not meet high demands of using means of transportation so the citizens must use their own vehicles. Moreover, public transportation in some countries can not cover both rural and urban areas so people who live in rural ones have to use their motorbikes and cars. If there is a charge for every turns they get into the city, it will place a burden on them.

In conclusion, charging private vehicles has its own advantages and disadvantages as well as not being the most appropriate way so I suppose that the government should take many factors into account and give an answer mixed of many solutions together.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-09-26 Duy3011 84 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 403, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... some extent, but it has drawbacks too. Indeed, those who choose to be all in fa...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 197, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , …
...ping nations like Vietnam, Lao, Cambodia,… can not meet high demands of using mea...
^^
Line 9, column 201, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Can
... nations like Vietnam, Lao, Cambodia,… can not meet high demands of using means of...
^^^
Line 13, column 253, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nswer mixed of many solutions together.
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, may, moreover, so, still, thus, well, i suppose, in addition, in conclusion, in particular, such as, as a result, as well as, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1660.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06097560976 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95904525818 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582317073171 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3451383711 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.571428571 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4285714286 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.1428571429 7.06120827912 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1328073804 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0453867878249 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0304613478121 0.0667982634062 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0720698118203 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0407631267362 0.056905535591 72% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.