In some countries the government promotes public transport as the primary means of transportation, and discourages private vehicle ownership. Do you think the advantages of this policy outweigh the disadvantages?
Recently, it has been reported that higher authorities are encouraging people to use trains or buses rather than their own vehicles for transportation. I strongly argue that the benefits surpass the drawbacks.
One of the cogent merits of being suggested to take advantage of public transport rather than to own a personal vehicle is that the probability of traffic accidents would gradually decrease. A compelling example would be that most vehicle management companies may have to recruit experienced drivers and train them rigorously before they start working to avoid unnecessary risks and ensuring that people's lives would be more secured. Moreover, in some big cities where there are many traffic jams due to the excessive amount of motor vehicles, the policy of using public transport will help people avoid worrying about being late, everyone may move to the same place at the same time, so people here will maintain their lives safe and comfortable.
Another convincing benefit is that using public transports would help reduce environmental pollution. It could decrease the amount of noise affecting citizens when they are living or working, hence bringing tranquility to people, helping them stay focused on the work that has to get done. Furthermore, when the number of vehicles is reduced to a certain extent, the atmosphere becomes fresher..
However, it does seem reasonable that limiting personal vehicle ownership may also lead to negative outcomes. One of which is that it affects the economies of the countries that are facing the trend. A convincing benefit is that if each individual or every family is not allowed to own their own vehicle, the income of the auto industry would shrink, due to the low figure of customers. Furthermore, everyone has different demands and when they are ordered to move to other places, in which public transport is not supported for their sake of working and living such as a narrow alley, it would cause inconvenience for everyone.
In conclusion, I would like to reiterate the merits of the government encouraging public transit as the major mode of transportation while discouraging private vehicle ownership including the lower possibility of traffic accidents and the better condition of people's living environment, dominate the drawbacks such as lowering the income of the auto industry. However, it is recommended that the government should come up with policies that are suitable for people's lives to avoid bad cases from happening.
- In some countries the government promotes public transport as the primary means of transportation and discourages private vehicle ownership Do you think the advantages of this policy outweigh the disadvantages 73
- In some countries the government promotes public transport as the primary means of transportation and discourages private vehicle ownership Do you think the advantages of this policy outweigh the disadvantages 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 394, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...n extent, the atmosphere becomes fresher.. However, it does seem reasonable t...
^^
Line 5, column 397, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...xtent, the atmosphere becomes fresher.. However, it does seem reasonable that li...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, moreover, so, while, as to, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 7.30460921844 260% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2111.0 1615.20841683 131% => OK
No of words: 399.0 315.596192385 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29072681704 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46933824581 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81194295765 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 176.041082164 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551378446115 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 669.6 506.74238477 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 84.3698127657 49.4020404114 171% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.785714286 106.682146367 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5 20.7667163134 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.71428571429 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171421075968 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0566354527797 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0494987440872 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0899724636387 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0477155391729 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.0946893788 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 50.2224549098 69% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.