In some countries, governments are encouraging industries and business to move to regional areas outside the big cities. Do the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages?
It is a fact that companies and factories should be moved to suburb areas rather than gathering in the downtown. This trend of some countries would introduce both advantages and disadvantages, but in my opinion I think the benefits do outweigh the drawbacks.
On the one hand, when industrial zones have significantly grown in the big cities, which may pose a threat on traffic and polluted environment. One evident weakness is that when many vehicles deliver products or raw materials from place to place, this causes the congestion at peak hours. In other words, the traffic situation is getting worse because of road accidents which are unavoidable with the thick density of traffic participants. Another reason is that it is a big burden on the people’s inhabitants. Smoke and waste discharged from business areas is a main culprit to destroy the fresh rivers, lakes even oceans. For example, Thi Nghe river of Viet Nam was never clean because surrounding companies have discharged a huge rubbish and water waste into it.
On the other hand, I argue that the advantages of this solution would prove to be worthwhile in terms of distribution’s labor force and environmental improvement. First, when industrial zones are located in remote areas in which will attract employees from different places. It is also able to create new job opportunities for local people. Second, this relocation brings about a range of benefits for citizens in noise pollution. Noise from giant machines or human activities will be released remarkably when these companies have not existed in the cities.
In conclusion, there are minus points to traffic and pollution. However, it seems to me that its advantages would be more important regarding attraction’s labor work and noise pollution.
- The graph below shows the rate of smoking per 1000 people in Someland from 1960 to 2000
- The graph below shows the rate of smoking per 1000 people in Someland from 1960 to 2000
- In some countries young people have become richer healthier and live longer What are the causes What can be done to address this situation 67
- The charts show the sources of electricity produced in 4 countries between 2003 aand 2008 73
- Influence of human beings on the world s ecosystem is leading to the extinction of species and loss of bio diversity what are the primary cause of loss of bio diversity What solutions can you suggest 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, regarding, second, so, while, for example, i think, in conclusion, in my opinion, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1518.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27083333333 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02978200421 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618055555556 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.3836475467 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.2 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0666666667 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174250258759 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0504093261263 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0533438224182 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104660321438 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0712621972496 0.056905535591 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.