In some countries governments pay the money for students’ university fees，while in other countries, students pay for themselves. Do advantages of governments paying for the students outweigh its disadvantages?
There are different approaches of how tuition fees are paid for students to go to university. In some countries, students can go to university because their government sponsors them. In my opinion, I think the negative consequences surpass the benefits.
On the one hand, the situation of governments pay for students’ fee might be rational in the following reasons. The main point is that they could create a “win-win” relationship between governments and students. By paying university’s fee from their government, students will be unnecessarily to work for paying their student loan during their studying period, thus they will be fully able to pay attention to their study. Their country, therefore, would have some better skilled professionals to work for their government and contribute to their society. As a result, their government will be beneficial from these workers due to their taxes paying toward the government, which in turn support their next generation’s education.
There are, however, more problems that are associated with this approach need to pay attention to. The first point is that students would be less thoughtful about which subject they should study practically for their future. If they do not need to pay for studying in university, which means they will have less pressure in terms of their financial situation, thus they might choose subjects toward their habits or interests that will not be able to contribute to their society and making enough money for themself. Secondly, students may treat their classes non-valuably. For instance, they could skip classes and not pay attention to their study. As a result, university seems cheap and useless in students’ sight and will be less effective to produce great professions.
In conclusion, it may be reasonable that government pay for students’ university. However, the university may lose their function when students not treasure the opportunity of studying. As far as I concerned, the government should not pay for student’s university fees.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-12-15 | chiayuchen | 91 | view |
| 2017-07-21 | Thao Anh194 | 84 | view |
- Online shopping is replacing shopping in stores Is it a positive or negative development 95
- In some countries governments pay the money for students university fees while in other countries students pay for themselves Do advantages of governments paying for the students outweigh its disadvantages 91
- The users of social media, such as Facebook, Twitter, are replacing face to face contact in this century. Do you think the advantages of this way outweigh the disadvantages? 67
- It is difficult for people to live in cities to get enough physical exercise What are the causes and what are solutions could be taken to solve the problem 95
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 159, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...he main point is that they could create a 'win-win' relationship betwee...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, for instance, i think, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 7.85571142285 255% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1760.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48286604361 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20390407318 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517133956386 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 509.4 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.8693640502 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.529411765 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8823529412 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.82352941176 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.402523673372 0.244688304435 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.175902988358 0.084324248473 209% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124742259348 0.0667982634062 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.311560488372 0.151304729494 206% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0888781377387 0.056905535591 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.