In some countries, an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is, therefore, necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
In the last few years, the consumption of fast foods has become more and more widespread, so that health concerns also make people disputy.Some argue that a higher tax rate should be imposed on fast food when health problems appear more and more popular, which is largely influenced by fast food research.
There are countless reasons why fast food is so popular today, in which time and money reductions are the two biggest reasons that promote it.Instead of having to spend hours to go to the supermarket to choose fresh foods and then cook them up, with fast food, customers spend less time waiting to get themselves a delicious and full of energy meals.Besides, fast food provides a big amount of meals for low-income people and homeless people because the cost of such a meal is much cheaper than a full-fledged traditional nutrient meals.
On the other hand, is the direct tax on consumers really a solution for all negative affects from junk food?In my opinion, it is only effective for a short time. Instead, the tax rate should be targeted at organizations that operate, develop and distribute junk food.The more a brand sells a meal with most meat and milk products, the more it faces a high tax rate because in order to maintain the amount of meat supplied to consumption, livestock needs to be expanded that makes more global greenhouse gas emissions.The tax rate would be lower if the brand added vegetables to the meal and replaced the soft drinks with pure water.Although the cultivation of vegetables is harmful to the environment, but agriculture consumes less water and emits less harmful impurities than the livestock industry and at least, it is currently feasible to force The company that owns the brand is more responsible for the benefit of the community rather than completely focusing on economic benefits.Moreover, high tariffs also indirectly affect the work of workers working in fast food chain stores.
In general, finding ways to restrain junk food is impossible, instead, the government should devise measures to balance the interests and physical well-being of consumers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-18 | thebao2510 | 56 | view |
| 2019-08-11 | Xiem Bubu | 56 | view |
| 2019-08-04 | Duong Linh | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-04 | Duong Linh | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-04 | Duong Linh | 73 | view |
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 73
- Some children find learning history at school very exciting, but many others think it is very boring. In what ways can history be brought to life for all school children? 61
- In some countries, an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is, therefore, necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food.To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- One of the consequences of improved medical care is that the people are living longer and life expectancy is increasing.Do you think the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your 56
- The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors who satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.Summa 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 140, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Some
...ealth concerns also make people disputy.Some argue that a higher tax rate should be ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 142, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Instead
...the two biggest reasons that promote it.Instead of having to spend hours to go to the s...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 350, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Besides
...es a delicious and full of energy meals.Besides, fast food provides a big amount of mea...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 108, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...for all negative affects from junk food?In my opinion, it is only effective for a ...
^^
Line 3, column 267, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...erate, develop and distribute junk food.The more a brand sells a meal with most mea...
^^^
Line 3, column 517, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...es more global greenhouse gas emissions.The tax rate would be lower if the brand ad...
^^^
Line 3, column 632, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Although
...eplaced the soft drinks with pure water.Although the cultivation of vegetables is harmfu...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 986, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Moreover
...ompletely focusing on economic benefits.Moreover, high tariffs also indirectly affect th...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, moreover, really, so, then, well, at least, in general, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1762.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 349.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04871060172 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85101294436 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570200573066 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 537.3 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 16.0721442886 31% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 69.0 20.2975951904 340% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 286.360332448 49.4020404114 580% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 352.4 106.682146367 330% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 69.8 20.7667163134 336% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 22.4 7.06120827912 317% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201992917146 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118571808626 0.084324248473 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0526326303407 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126405894005 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0523257084801 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 37.3 13.0946893788 285% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 9.9 50.2224549098 20% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 29.0 11.3001002004 257% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 13.19 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.45 8.58950901804 133% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 26.5 9.78957915832 271% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 29.6 10.1190380762 293% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.