In some countries the number of people who visit art galleries is declining. What are the reasons for this? How can we solve this problem?
Visiting art galleries has become more and more unpopular as number of visitors are decreasing in many countries. This could be due to galleries showcasing the same art which can be easily accessed online. There are a few measures which can be taken to improve this situation.
It is believed that the declining interest in visiting art galleries is a result of the lack of new artworks being exhibited. Showcasing the same piece of art over and over again will not give visitors a reason to visit again in the future. Moreover, with the advent of the internet, most artwork can easily be found through a simple Google search. To illustrate this, according to a survey conducted by the Royal Academy of Arts, a majority of the responders would rather learn about a specific art piece online than appreciating the work in person because it is more convenient and less time consuming for their already hectic lifestyle.
However, this situation can be reversed if the right actions are taken. In order to maintain interest among the community, local art galleries should collaborate with other art museums across the globe to exchange artworks every few months. This could potentially attract more visitors as they do not need to travel to another country to enjoy an artwork that was previously exclusive to a specific art gallery. Furthermore, teachers also play an important role in cultivating an artistic interest in school students. For instance, this can be achieved by introducing more art classes into the school curriculum or arranging more field trips to art museums.
In conclusion, it is clear that the declining number of art gallery visitors can be attributed to the lack of interest within the community. Therefore, measures such as regularly updating the art exhibits and encouraging students to take an interest in arts should be carried out.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1560.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06493506494 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74204410421 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561688311688 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.9132906417 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.428571429 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256985975281 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0989566080155 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0458989885068 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171216518488 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0399630599352 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.