In some countries students pay the college and universities fees themselves, but in other it is paid by the government. Do the advantages of government money outweigh disadvantages?
Undoubtedly, regime should managing fund to expand on education system to reduce literacy rates. However, a few numbers of nations there colleges and universities charges filled by learners where in remaining nations authorities paying these fees. The pros of governing wealth like beneficial for poor students and organise campus to educate people about higher education overshadow cons such as difficult to finance budgets and not care on other areas.
The main benefit of government money paid in a form of colleges and universities fees is that international students who come from poor countries into develop nations to take higher studies as well as a little amount of students is those who are very wise and bright in education but not able to pay charges of higher education centres so it is helpful for them because government providing them scholarships. In addition to this, in some nations a few people is suffering from poverty as well as not eligible to pay colleges and universities fees of their offsprings so in that case it is responsibility of authorities to provide aid to them as they are citizens of those countries. For example, in Canada a native learners who are poor but better in education so Canadian regime give scholarships to them for continuing their studies and also offer scholarships to foreign students.
The another major advantage is that government can utilise money to organising campaigns to motivate students to take higher education because learners are the future of nations. Furthermore, some parents are not be able to fill the charges of colleges and universities of their offspring so that it why they stop sending their children into higher education centres and these camps help to in courage those guardians to send their children into colleges. Even though, educational campaigns are necessary for lazy masses to educate them about studies as they negligible to go in colleges and universities. For instance, in India there are some areas who are living under poverty and their offspring is not going into higher education centres so that is why a majority of members who hired by regime visit there and provide tuition classes to learners and motivate them to take higher education.
Nevertheless, the main concerning phase of this notion is that if authorities will spend a vast amount of money on upgrading education services and neglect other areas than it is perilous for government to maintain their budgets. Moreover, there are lots of concern areas like health care, job sectors and etcetera who also demanding funds from regime of their enhancement as they are crucial for government to providing income. Apart from this, if regime will pay fess of poor students than other progenitors will be felt that authorities will show differences with them. For example, in China regime announced that they should pay charges of poorer learners of Colleges and universities but some parents who are eligible for paying fees start doing protests because they think that authorities see disparities between them.
In conclusion, although it is good for learners who lives under poverty paid their higher education centres fees by authorities but if regime will pay huge money on education system than it is stressful for others such as health, public transport, job sectors and so on.
- The charts give information about two genres of TV programmes watched by men and women and four different age groups in Australia.Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- The table chart shows the proportion of pupils attending four secondary schools types between between 2000 and 2009. Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The graph below shows the population figure for different types of turtles in India from 1980 to 2012.Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Nowadays cities have become overcrowded. Given reason and its solutions. 73
- Nowadays food has become easier to prepare. Has this change improved the way of life? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 308, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in education but not able to pay charges of higher education centres so it is hel...
^^
Line 3, column 718, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'learner'?
Suggestion: learner
...ntries. For example, in Canada a native learners who are poor but better in education so...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 214, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...ions. Furthermore, some parents are not be able to fill the charges of colleges an...
^^
Line 5, column 446, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...se guardians to send their children into colleges. Even though, educational campa...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, well, apart from, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 13.1623246493 190% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 10.4138276553 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 18.0 7.30460921844 246% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 46.0 24.0651302605 191% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 81.0 41.998997996 193% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.3376753507 264% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2799.0 1615.20841683 173% => OK
No of words: 544.0 315.596192385 172% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14522058824 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.82947280553 4.20363070211 115% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76558025031 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.420955882353 0.561755894193 75% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 891.9 506.74238477 176% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 36.0 20.2975951904 177% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 75.0486064716 49.4020404114 152% => OK
Chars per sentence: 186.6 106.682146367 175% => OK
Words per sentence: 36.2666666667 20.7667163134 175% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4666666667 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20756104946 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0812393275213 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0606977539271 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1323026864 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0368075139361 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.0 13.0946893788 160% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.94 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.3 11.3001002004 153% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.4 10.1190380762 162% => OK
text_standard: 21.0 10.7795591182 195% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.