Some nations has seen a dramatic change that come with the emergence of the Internet in the way of learning for the past decades. Admittedly, this alteration in educational system has presented some challenges perplexing the stakeholders of this realm. However, I would contend that the overall impact of the Internet is beneficial to them. These benefits are twofold.
First of all, this is an indisputable fact that the convenience and efficiency brought by the Internet fosters the exploration processes of enlightenment in these countries. Given the countless sources of information exists on the Internet, it ensures the free flow of Information that is incredibly essential for students who immerse in their studies. Despite the issue of reliability and accuracy of these content - a problem which is paradoxically due to the liberty of publication on this globally shared medium - most of the researchers are remains satisfied with the simplified routine provided by this invention in comparison to penetrating books overnight in a library in bygone era.
Further and even more importantly, though, some institutions has seen a remedy for frequent commute required in orthodox cultivation under the auspices of the Internet. In fact, people living in these affluent city are now equipped with a handful of devices with Internet connection, ranging from desktop computers at home to personal smartphones in their pockets. Therefore, interacting with these ensuing electronic installations, students can gain access to their educational platforms, which in turn allow them embarking on learning activities virtually regardless to physical restriction. Likewise, that, coupled with the immediacy of the Internet, can also benefit the submission of assignment and communication with teachers.
By way of conclusion, I once again reaffirm my position that the advent of the Internet grants us a positive corollary in school because of the advancement on information exchange and communication.
- The chart below shows the different levels of post-school qualifications in Australia and the proportion of men and women who held them in 1999.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- The chart below shows the number of trips made by children in one country in 1990 and 2010 to travel to and from school using different modes of transport.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where r 78
- Many teachers assign homework to students every day. Do you think that daily homework is necessary for students?Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 78
- Some say you should always marry for love; others say that in an uncertain world it's wiser to marry for money.Discuss both points of view and give your own opinion.You should write at least 250 words. 84
- Scientists agree that many people are eating too much junk food and it is damaging their health. Some people think that this problems can be solved by educating people to eat less junk food. Other people believe that education will not work. Discuss both 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 14, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'have', 'haven'.
Suggestion: have; haven
Some nations has seen a dramatic change that come with t...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, likewise, so, therefore, in fact, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1700.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61056105611 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19625217239 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610561056106 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 533.7 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 73.6720869047 49.4020404114 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.666666667 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.25 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109216034549 0.244688304435 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0405764910547 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0315947488918 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0713503865234 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0191817641055 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.77 8.58950901804 125% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.