in some countries, young people are encouraged to work or travel for a year between finishing high school and starting university studies. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages for young people who decide to do this.
Word and travel benefits the students in many aspects. Students taking a year gap between school and university studies become very natural in many countries. From my perspective there are more advantages than disadvantages by taking a year gap before starting university studies. Students gains knowledge by having year gap before beginning university students and also there is a chance of deviating student’s interest on studies.
Traveling and working before university studies brings plethora advantages to students. Lads by working as an appropriate in their future study field helps them to gain knowledge as well as a small amount of money. In their university studies the students can apply this practical knowledge and that helps him to study with ease. Students can also pay his fee in university himself by earning in this year gap. Young people while traveling encounters many people with different skills and various cultures. That makes him very intelligent in social skills. This benefits students to cope with university people like mentors, class mismanagement and workers easily. There are few disadvantages also for students by taking the year gap.
Students by working and traveling before university studies leads to a wrong direction in few cases. There is a chance of mind diversion from studies to other activities. Young people by focusing on travelling or work may leads them to change their goals and aims. Because they habituated to work and enjoy. There is also chance of losing interest on a study that may spoil the student's career.
In conclusion, there is more chance of advantages than disadvantages for students taking a year gap between school and university education students get benefited by takes year gap but they can also lose interest on education
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-22 | eppa akhil | 61 | view |
- The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country. 78
- *Some people say that e books and modern technology will totally replace traditional newspaper and magzines to what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- Some people say that e books and modern technology will totally replace traditional newspaper and magzines to what extent do you agree or disagree 42
- Both governments and individuals are spending too much money protecting animals and their habitat. This money could be better spent dealing with fundamental issues in society .what extend do you agree or disagree? 56
- Both government and individuals are spending too much money protecting animals and their habitat. This money should be better spent dealing with fundamental issues in society such as poverty and health care. To what extent do you agree?
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 167, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'takes'' or 'take's'?
Suggestion: takes'; take's
...ity education students get benefited by takes year gap but they can also lose interes...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 226, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...they can also lose interest on education
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, well, while, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1519.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29268292683 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77992886019 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 176.041082164 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.459930313589 0.561755894193 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 473.4 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.4608248833 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.3888888889 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9444444444 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.44444444444 7.06120827912 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256673866239 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0909278973446 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.065741879828 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167625030369 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0355441215052 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.3 8.58950901804 85% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 78.4519038076 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.