Some groups of people have benefited from modern communication technology. However, some think they do not have any benefit from this. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is a common belief that the promotion of technology enables people to communicate with each other easier and more conveniently than in the past. However, there are some argument that they don’t have any profit from technological communication. I totally agree with this statement due to the following reasons such as backwardness and generation gap.
The first reason that not all countries in the world can overtake with the global technological growth due to different reasons. Perhaps, financial status is the biggest problem which prevents some countries from using electronic devices to make contact in daily life. Another reason that is worth mentioning is that backwardness in some regions is also a drawback for individuals accessing to modern communication methods. A typical example for this is that some countries in Africa are still living in poverty or backwardness, so citizens in these regions can’t catch up with universal technological trend or afford to buy for themselves fancy gadgets. This makes difficult for people counterparts to approach electronic devices and derive the benefit from contemporary communication tools
On the other hand, generation gap is also the reason why I agree with the aforementioned statement because youngsters are new generation who have been allowed to use electronic devices since they were young so there is no obstacle for them to use technological stuffs to communicate, while the older is the previous generations who can’t catch up with younger counterparts. For instance, although my grandparents own brand new cellphones, they are always looking for someone who specializes in technology to show them tutorials of using or downloading applications.
In conclusion, it is really crucial to make chance for all people in the world to approach modern communication methods and propagate its significance.
- The graph below shows transport preferences among young people from different countries Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The maps below show a science park in 2008 and the same park today Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some groups of people have benefited from modern communication technology However some think they do not have any benefit from this To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Some groups of people have benefited from modern communication technology However some think they do not have any benefit from this To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Some groups of people have benefited from modern communication technology However some think they do not have any benefit from this To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, look, really, so, still, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1597.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50689655172 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17838456115 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.572413793103 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 115.620759382 49.4020404114 234% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 159.7 106.682146367 150% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.0 20.7667163134 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3 7.06120827912 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224371561149 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0950117873944 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0767195964135 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136406288001 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0729310093849 0.056905535591 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.0 13.0946893788 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 50.2224549098 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.27 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.