In recent world, there are several kinds of companies with different works. Some institutions pose the rules to their stuff that they should wear dresses which looks smart. However, other organisations put pressure into the output rather than clothing. I think, clothing depends upon the work of one company.
One the one hand, it is undeniable that employees of a company should dressed well. This is because, some institutions are service based, and they have to get in touch with the people from all stages. In a bank, For example, officers have to conduct with a poor person as well as some richest persons at the same period. Therefore, they have to be on well dressed so that they can face any genre of people without any hesitation. Furthermore, if it comes to a car selling company, they also should have to be well dressed. A car seller have to communicate with wealthy persons. If that person feel uneasy because of the dress code of the seller, he would not wish to come again. So, in this matter employees ought to wear the suitable cloths.
On the other hand, some organisations require innovative ideas, new strategies, and hard work from their employees. To illustrate, worker of a production company have to work hard, so, there is no function of clothing, they can wear whatever they want. In addition, employees of Google and Facebook need not to wear formal cloths as they have not to deal with customers. The employer requires unique ideas, new things that can bring more facilities, and new services over online so that they can expand their services. For this, they have to use their brain rather than body. As a consequence of this, those companies are not required to maintain any smart dress code.
To put in a nutshell, i think well dress up should be considered for those companies who conduct with customers to influence their consumers. Others do not need to maintain a strict clothing.
- The bar charts illustrate the alterations and differences in the average percentages of sodium, saturated fats and added sugars in typical meals consumed in the USA. 67
- In many countries a small number of people earn extremely high salaries Some people believe that this is good for the country but others think that governments should not allow salaries above a certain level Discuss both these views and give your own o 56
- It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops Technology and traditional cultures are incompatible To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view 78
- Information technology is changing many aspects of our lives and now dominates our home leisure and work activities To what extent do the benefits of information technology outweigh the disadvantages 73
- Nowadays technology is increasing being used to monitor what people are saying and doing (for example, through cellphone tracking and security cameras). In many cases, the people being monitored are unaware that this is happening. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 212, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h the people from all stages. In a bank, For example, officers have to conduct wi...
^^
Line 5, column 309, Rule ID: NEEDNT_TO_DO_AND_DONT_NEED_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'wear'?
Suggestion: wear
...ployees of Google and Facebook need not to wear formal cloths as they have not to deal ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 23, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...rt dress code. To put in a nutshell, i think well dress up should be considere...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, look, so, therefore, well, for example, i think, in addition, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1594.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81570996979 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5574370562 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534743202417 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.4993220261 49.4020404114 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 79.7 106.682146367 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.55 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.15 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1541837608 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0534121888932 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0472854726356 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111735123777 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0320593050506 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.0946893788 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.38 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.