Some organisations believe that their employees should dress smartly. Others value quality of work above appearance.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Some people claim that it is essential to wear elegant clothes in the workplace, while others believe that work productivity is much more significant. I personally agree with the idea that the efficiency of work should be prioritized.
On the one hand, dressing smartly is of great importance for those who are responsible for face-to-face interaction with customers. Firstly, the way people dress not only helps them to show their respect to others but also is an incentive for them to behave professionally. Furthermore, dressing up impeccably is also a major contributor to boost one’s confidence at work. For example, it can be easily seen that teachers always wear appropriate costumes when teaching at schools. To be in a good look does bring them self-assurance.
On the other hand, the opposing view is absolutely reasonable that work productivity must be given precedence over appearances.It is often believed that people who dress unconcernedly complete their tasks much more effectively than those who spend too much time preparing for suitable. A convincing evidence could be Facebook , a company which is known for having no dress code for some specific positions required no direct communication with clients such as computer engineers or accountants. They reserve a right to wear comfortable clothes such as sweater pants or even jeans. In an interview with journalists in 2018, Mark Zuckerberg, the chairman of this successful company, said that encouraging workers to dress comfortably is an optimal solution to foster the growth of the company. In fact, Facebook is second to none when it comes to media industry.
In conclusion, even though almost every white-collar worker is required to dress formally, I would be in favor of the thought that staff should be advised to focus more on their expertise rather than their attires.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-29 | martinestefan | 56 | view |
2020-01-01 | MustafaR | 73 | view |
2019-11-30 | kamalcalc1977 | 73 | view |
2019-11-30 | kamalcalc1977 | 73 | view |
2019-11-30 | kamalcalc1977 | 11 | view |
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement. To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their w 78
- In some countries, an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is, therefore, necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food. To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Earlier technological development brought more changes to the life of ordinary people than recent technological development does. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- The diagram below show the changes that have taken place at West Park Secondary School since its construction in 1950. 78
- The world is experiencing a dramatic increase in population, which is causing problems not only for poor, undeveloped countries, but also for industrialised and developed nations. Describe some of the problems that overpopulation causes, and suggest at le 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 128, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: It
...st be given precedence over appearances.It is often believed that people who dress...
^^
Line 5, column 326, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... A convincing evidence could be Facebook , a company which is known for having no ...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...none when it comes to media industry. In conclusion, even though almost every wh...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, look, second, so, while, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1564.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26599326599 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0636977434 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616161616162 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.7053043853 49.4020404114 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.307692308 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8461538462 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1538461538 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143968460259 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0480349652252 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0424241006073 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0972661958454 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0279046609526 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.