Some parents think that childcare centres provide the best services for children of pre-school age. Other working parents think that family members such as grandparents will be better carers for their kids.Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Although it is believed that pre-school kids receive a better education in specialized institutions, others commend that grandparents are more important for children’s development. In my opinion, I consider that valuable outcomes are offered to children who are registered in daycare programmes. This essay will discuss both aspects of this debate.

On the one hand, some mothers and fathers applaud the benefits which institutionalized education brings to their offspring. Children enrolled in daycares tend to be more prepared for when they need to go to school and get out in the community. Educators teach children, between three and five years old, how to read and count, and their interpersonal skills develop greatly during their interaction with kids of their own age. Recent studies show that institutionalized children perform better in school and adapt quickly to a new environment.

On the other hand, others say that grandparents are a much valuable option, as caregivers, for their small ones. Many take into consideration that by remaining with family members kids would feel safer, within their home and loving environment. This essay disagrees that this overprotecting strategy would be of too much help when pre-school children start elementary school. For instance, kids who start school right after “home education” usually adapt harder to new conditions and new rules due to their fragile emotional state.

In conclusion, family members ought to pass the responsibility of educating pre-school kids to a more specialized institution, in order for children to adapt faster to the new school environment and perform accordingly.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
IELTS Writing Task II - IELTS Academic
Essays by the user:
>>> more essays by the user >>>

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 114, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun take seems to be countable; consider using: 'Many takes'.
Suggestion: Many takes
...n, as caregivers, for their small ones. Many take into consideration that by remaining wi...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, so, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1421.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.59448818898 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20259559002 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.602362204724 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 425.7 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0918308253 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.416666667 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1666666667 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255524241805 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0953839164532 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0399536959956 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166076974 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0173724041446 0.056905535591 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.