One of the most conspicuous trends of today's world is a colossal upsurge in the number of individuals believing that cops carry not weapons with them which influence highly volcanic in community. In my opinion, this apprehension sounds me more irrational.
To commence with, there are deluges of arguments in favor of this stance. The most preponderant one is to guns carried to control crime rate. This is because, policeman on the beet with arms at that time criminal get fear to commit any crime. if they have not any weapon with them, not one have fear to do any kind of criminal. It can not only contribute to limit the crime rate, but also leads to numerous other benefits in various fields such as healthy environment. Thanks to the wide range of advantages police with gun offers, masses can enhance the productivity and quality of their lives much easy and efficacy. Needless to say, all these merits stand in one good stead, as far as augmenting their chances of prosperity and excellence is concerned.
Furthermore, another pivotal aspect of aforementioned preposition is that it is only likely to help one excel and thrive by maintaining rules and angulation. To explain it, with weapon police make ensure people that if anyone try to create valance, they can kill them or harm them. So, this thing make reduction in crime rate in society. For instance, a study result published by the government of Australia in March 2014 and April 2016, clearly indicates that police make decline in crime rate in every city with the help of guns. Hence, it is clear that why many are in favor of this viewpoint.
On the other hand, a section of society contradict above said view by providing some justification. The primary factor is that influence other people, To elaborate it, when cop carry gun in public area it have negetive impact on other people those are around them. Therefore, some are not agree with above said viewpoint.
To conclude, having pondered over above said, it is crystal clear that police carry gun is indeed too great to ignore.
- Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change Others however think that change is always a good thing Discuss both views and give your own opinion 80
- The diagram below shows how ethanol fuel is produced from corn 73
- It s generally believed that success in fields such as art and sport can only be achieved if a person has natural talent However it s sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or artist Discuss both these views and give 73
- The diagram below shows how ethanol fuel is produced from corn
- Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change Others however think that change is always a good thing Discuss both views and give your own opinion
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 243, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
... criminal get fear to commit any crime. if they have not any weapon with them, not...
^^
Line 2, column 730, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gmenting their chances of prosperity and excellence is concerned. Furthermore, a...
^^
Line 3, column 226, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'anyone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'tries'.
Suggestion: tries
...olice make ensure people that if anyone try to create valance, they can kill them o...
^^^
Line 4, column 205, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'has'?
Suggestion: has
...t, when cop carry gun in public area it have negetive impact on other people those a...
^^^^
Line 4, column 289, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'agreed'.
Suggestion: agreed
...re around them. Therefore, some are not agree with above said viewpoint. To conclude...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, so, therefore, for instance, kind of, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1706.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 354.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81920903955 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58774331449 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590395480226 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 556.2 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.484395642 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.7777777778 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221781103323 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0668642602467 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0393869990199 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114561660718 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0193854098643 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.