One of the most conspicuous trends of today's world is a colossal upsurge in the number of people believing that whether person can become successful in sports or art by natural ability or by learning skills. In this essay, i will discuss both side in upcoming paragraphs.
To commence with, there deluges of arguments in favor of teaching skills. The most preponderant one is that person can learn from mistakes. To elaborate it, when human make any kind mistake while doing something, they get result in negative which tough them about which is right way to do work. It can not only contribute to improve their skills, but also leads to numerous other benefits in various fields such as sportsman can loss match. Thanks to the wide range of advantages learning offers, masses can enhance the productivity and quality of their lives much ease and efficacy. Needless to say, all these merits stand in one good stead, as far as augmenting their chances of prosperity and excellence is concerned.
Furthermore, another pivotal aspect of aforementioned proposition is that it is only likely to help one excel and thrive by some very talented people are lazy and they do not achieve anything in life. This is because, person do not need learn only skills but when person learn anythings to achieve success. For instance, a study result published by the government of Australia in March 2013 and April 2015, clearly indicates that most of famous sportsman and artist become successful after taking knowledge of their field. Hence, it is clear that why many are in favor this viewpoint.
On the other hand, a section of society contradict above said view by providing some justification that natural talented helps in achieving success. The primary one is that inborn qualities is necessary for success. To explain it, when person have quality of better imagination and creative to do something then they do not need to learn anything by which they can easy show their best in their field. Therefore, some are not favor above said viewpoint.
To conclude, having pondered over above said view it is crystal clear that success in fields such as art and sport can only be achieved by that person by learning or taking profession is indeed too great to ignore.
- Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change Others however think that change is always a good thing Discuss both views and give your own opinion
- The diagram below shows how ethanol fuel is produced from corn
- Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change Others however think that change is always a good thing Discuss both views and give your own opinion
- The chart below gives attendance figures for Grandville Stadium from 2017 which are projected through 2030 after a major improvement project 78
- The diagram below shows how ethanol fuel is produced from corn 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 224, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...y or by learning skills. In this essay, i will discuss both side in upcoming para...
^
Line 3, column 237, Rule ID: NEEDNT_TO_DO_AND_DONT_NEED_DO[3]
Message: Did you mean 'to learn'?
Suggestion: to learn
...fe. This is because, person do not need learn only skills but when person learn anyth...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, so, then, therefore, while, for instance, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1873.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 382.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90314136126 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56930071408 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547120418848 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 582.3 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.9566118586 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.176470588 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4705882353 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.05882352941 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306532308161 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0868253263759 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0838412123478 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189211486273 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0744528918573 0.056905535591 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.