Some people argue that parents of children who break the law should be punished in some way because they are responsible for their children s actions To what extent do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

Some people argue that parents of children who break the law should be punished in some way, because they are responsible for their children’s actions. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is believed that parents whose children fail to comply with the law should also be subject to some kinds of punishments due to their responsibility of their children’s behaviours. While it seems to be convincing to some extents, parents shouldn’t be blamed and punished.
Those who are in favour of the view may claim that parents are the ones who leave the biggest impacts on a child’s mind and their actions, and therefore the responsibility should be laid on them. Firstly, at the early age with the incomplete developments of cognitive abilities and morality, children consider their parents as the model and standard of manners. Therefore, when their parents fail to follow the law or have offending actions, it is not explainable when their offspring imitate their wrongdoing. Secondly, all the surrounding factors that children are exposed to are decided by their parents. In other words, if children are influenced by savage friends, substandard education system or violent scenes around them, parents should be accountable for their negligence or improper childrearing. Additionally, the fact that parents of juvenile delinquents are given some kinds of sentence such as fire of imprisonment emphasizes the importance of attentive and proper childrearing. Hence, knowing the consequences of their irresponsibility or wrong teaching, parents or those who intend to give births will be more thoughtful and serious with their offspring’s nourishment.
On the other hand, I am convinced that it is not always justifiable to apply serious censure to parents of juvenile convicts. Obviously, parents are not the only one who leave influence on a child’s perception and behaviours. It is reported that the intention to commit crimes originates from various factors namely their own mental disorder, peer pressure, or unexpected circumstances. For examples, there are many cases where teenage criminals use drug or alcohol secretly without parents’ awareness due to their peers’ influence. These days, with the advent of social media, children are exposed to a wealth of information, crimes or antisocal behaviour included while there are some parents who are not digital native and are ignorant of the virtual world. Although they have attempted to manage their children’s screen time and give advice about healthy and decent lifestyles, it is impossible to control whom their children are contacting or what kind of information the children are exposed to. As a result, it is a shame to punish those who already made attempts to educate and take care of their children, but has to receive undesired results.
In conclusion, while parents cannot fully avoid the responsibility of their children’s wrong doing, I argue that applying certain penalties to them is sometimes unfair because the prevention of those crimes is out of their reach.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-01-07 trinhthanh1 61 view
Essays by user trinhthanh1 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 190, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ore the responsibility should be laid on them. Firstly, at the early age with the...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, as to, for example, in conclusion, kind of, such as, as a result, in other words, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 13.1623246493 213% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 10.4138276553 211% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 18.0 7.30460921844 246% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 43.0 24.0651302605 179% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2420.0 1615.20841683 150% => OK
No of words: 450.0 315.596192385 143% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37777777778 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6057793516 4.20363070211 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01813449045 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 176.041082164 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 738.9 506.74238477 146% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.9467197074 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.352941176 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4705882353 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7058823529 7.06120827912 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.383095757121 0.244688304435 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12424932185 0.084324248473 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0741319542422 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.259969508233 0.151304729494 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0681223784782 0.056905535591 120% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 78.4519038076 159% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.