Some people believe that all wild animals should be protected. Others say that few wild animals should be protected instead. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Nowadays, there is dramatic fall in forests area due to rapid increase in human population and with this the wild animals are victimized the most. Meanwhile people have different opinions about saving and protecting wild animals. A group of people believe that all wild animals should be protected while others think that we should only preserve several ones. The following paragraphs will discuss both views in detail, but I personally believe that all wild animals should be conserved.
To begin with, some people do not support the idea to preserve all wild animals for plethora of reasons. Firstly, they believe that the overpopulation of wild animals could become a threat to our existence. In other words, some wild animals are danger to human life and resources. Zebra, case in point, if its population in Africa is protected, and then the existence of these animals might become overpopulated, and as a result, they might explore the farming areas in Africa. Secondly, conserving wild animals requires a large amount of money. They believe that these funds should be allocated for humanity issues, as many third world countries are still struggling against starvation and deadly diseases.
However, others think that all wild animals must be protected. The main reason behind this view is that all of the wild animals play an important role in the ecosystem. Should there be one of these animals extinct, then the ecosystem would be unbalanced and it might have a catastrophic effect on the environment. Moreover, the existence of these wild animals is beneficial for human beings. To enumerate, scientists have found that some wild animals could be used as a medical treatment, such as the blood of a snake which can be used to heal skin diseases. Furthermore, all wild animals are important and should be equally protected. To explain, protecting some selected wild animals may lead to extinction of others and result in damage to the biodiversity of the world.
In conclusion, people have divergent views on protecting wild animals. As, every animal in one way or another is important to maintain balance in ecosystem, all should be protected.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 148, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Meanwhile,
...e wild animals are victimized the most. Meanwhile people have different opinions about sa...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 105, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...he main reason behind this view is that all of the wild animals play an important role in ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 775, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...amage to the biodiversity of the world. In conclusion, people have divergent vie...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, then, third, while, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1813.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 353.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13597733711 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70908931337 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512747875354 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 573.3 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.8081613374 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.4210526316 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5789473684 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.31578947368 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.601396062386 0.244688304435 246% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.219494062021 0.084324248473 260% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111784362932 0.0667982634062 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.415754193367 0.151304729494 275% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0911972418821 0.056905535591 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.