Some people believe that to be successful at a sport you need natural talent and others think hard work and practice is required. discuss both views and give your opinion.
Some people reckon that natural talent plays a huge role for a person to become successful at a sport, whereas others hold the view that hard work and practice is necessary. I think both of the views are essential in order to be successful. In this essay, I will look into both sides and try to draw conclusions.
On the one hand, some people claim that hard work and practice is necessary to become successful at any sport. It is true because even if a person is naturally talented or not, anyone can become good at sports by practicing hard with the right coaching. For example, China won 51 gold medals in Asian Games in 2016. Their Athletes did an enormous amount of hard work and practice to achieve this achievement. especially in table tennis in which Chinese players were not as good as they are nowadays.
On the other hand, others argue that natural talent leads a sportsperson to success. It is possible that natural talent may act as fuel on fire because talented people learn things quickly as compared to others. For some sports this viewpoint can be true for people of specific culture, ethnicity and region. For example, Australian Cricket team has outperformed against many teams from other countries in the last two decades. This could be because Cricket is highly popular in Australia and their players naturally good at this sport particularly.
To conclude, while hard work and practice has helped many sports persons to become successful, some people still feel that natural talent plays the most role in an individual's success. I think former view is true as talent can be acquired with hard work, practice and right supervision.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-30 | jaskaranvir2k15 | 61 | view |
- Shopping has become a new favourite for younger generation. why is this the case? should we encourage them to develop other hobbies too? 78
- nowadays museums and historical sites sites are mainly visited by foreign tourists than locals why is this happening what can be done to attract locals to visit museums and historical sites more often 86
- In recent years, many governments have brought in laws to ban smoking in public places. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Nowadays, some parents pressure their children to be successful in a specific field. What are the reasons for this? Is it a positive or negative development? 56
- These days many people prefer ready to eat food outside of their home rather than homemade food Do you think this has more advantages or disadvantages 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 410, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Especially
...d practice to achieve this achievement. especially in table tennis in which Chinese player...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 153, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... feel that natural talent plays the most role in an individuals success. I think ...
^^
Line 13, column 166, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...tural talent plays the most role in an individuals success. I think former view is true as...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, may, so, still, whereas, while, for example, i think, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1387.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8838028169 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52852208292 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538732394366 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 419.4 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.1955805306 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.4666666667 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9333333333 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.424805662465 0.244688304435 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148755756006 0.084324248473 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106767523568 0.0667982634062 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.297227492399 0.151304729494 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0658380900724 0.056905535591 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 78.4519038076 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.