Some people believe that children learn better when they are placed in classes with
children of similar academic abilities. Others believe that children learn better when
they are in classes with children representing a diverse range of academic abilities.
Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
There are different ideas about the best way to group children for learning.
According to some people, the best way is to group children with others who have
similar academic skills. But there are those who feel it is better to place children
in groups with mixed abilities. I agree with the second point of view.
Some people believe that children do best when they study with others of similar
abilities. They say that this allows children to learn at the right pace. By following
this method, faster children will not be held back by slower children, and slower
children will not be frustrated by trying to move ahead too fast.
Other people, however, think that children do better when they are in a mixed-level
class. For one thing, children who are working at a higher level can serve as models
for other children. They show the lower-level children what might be possible for
them. Also, higher-level children can help others with their work. This provides them
with challenges and reinforces their own learning.
I feel that the best method is to place children in mixed-level classes. A
classroom fllled with variety opens children's minds in many ways. In addition,
no two children are exactly alike. Therefore, it is impossible to have a completely
homogenous class, so why try to have one when you can have all the advantages
of a mixed-level class?
There may be some advantages to having children study only with others of
similar abilities, but I feel that there are many more advantages to studying in a
mixed-level group.
- Some people believe that children learn better when they are placed in classes withchildren of similar academic abilities. Others believe that children learn better whenthey are in classes with children representing a diverse range of academic abilities.D 56
- Some people believe that children learn better when they are placed in classes withchildren of similar academic abilities. Others believe that children learn better whenthey are in classes with children representing a diverse range of academic abilities.D 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, i feel, in addition, for one thing
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1319.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01520912548 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53240502715 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.524714828897 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 387.9 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.321983175 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.5882352941 106.682146367 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4705882353 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05882352941 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 20.0 4.38176352705 456% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.429263773728 0.244688304435 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.152819488065 0.084324248473 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0977194179941 0.0667982634062 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140686484201 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0802554798258 0.056905535591 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.0946893788 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 50.2224549098 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.3001002004 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.54 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.9 8.58950901804 80% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 78.4519038076 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.