Some people believe companies should pay for the damage the cause to the environment, while other say that government should be responsible for such expenses. Do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include examples from your experience.
Damage done with the environment can be hazardous. One of the most controversial issue today leads to that, the government should pay expenses for damage done by companies or not? I completely disagree with the statement and explore some reasons for this trend, through some assertions and examples in the further piece of essay.
The first step to understand that, why authority should be responsible for such expenses? The prominent reason is, government has many authorities, money collected from taxes and funds, but these facilities are for citizens living in the country. Similarly, government has many responsibilities, they have to look after for many other major issues either that is poverty or unemployment. Hence, it will become hard for government to solve those particular issues. A good illustration is; in Switzerland, citizens individually take care of the cleanness neither depending on the authorities nor on companies.
The second foremost reason to understand that, why companies are not giving initiative to recover the damage they are creating? Companies can take initiative from there own and can also help government by using chimney in the factories so that it can provide ventilation for hot flue gasses from a boiler or stove to the outside atmosphere. Moreover, they can also use LED lights instead of high voltage bulbs which will save 70 to 90 percentage of energy. As we all know that LED lightbulbs are more energy efficient, so people should switch to them and give an contribution in protecting environment.
In conclusion, there are number of answers to this question, but I tend to believe that, every individual should give a contribution and help in saving the environment because it is not only the responsibility of government for protecting the environment.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2018-09-27 | Rajan khehra | 44 | view |
- Many people believe that the use of new technology improves lives of employees. Other think it's a disadvantage for them. Discuss both point of views and give your opinion. 67
- Some people believe that preserving natural environment is crucial, however, most make no effort to do so. Why do you think this is happening? What are some simple actions that could help the environment. 73
- International travel makes people prejudiced rather than broad-minded? What are its causes and measures can be taken to solve this problem? 73
- The birth rate in most developed countries is predicted to begin to fall over the next 50 years. By 2030 it is estimated that over one third of the population in most developed countries will be aged 65 and over. What effects will these predictions have o 100
- Some people give that competitive sports are good for bringing together different people and cultures. Others argue that these sports can cause problems and can increase conflicts between the nations. Discuss both point of view and give your opinion. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 164, Rule ID: THERE_OWN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'their own'?
Suggestion: their own
...ing? Companies can take initiative from there own and can also help government by using c...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 562, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...o people should switch to them and give an contribution in protecting environment....
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, look, moreover, second, similarly, so, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1520.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25951557093 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06857407232 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598615916955 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.5485638779 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.923076923 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2307692308 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.92307692308 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.353312696267 0.244688304435 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117000388438 0.084324248473 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0709672554652 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211333706748 0.151304729494 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.04440590741 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.