Some people believe countries have moral obligations to help each other, others worry that the aid money cannot get to the poor of this world. Discuss both sides and give your own opinion.
It is true that globalization has made worldwide citizens to be closer. Therefore it is argued that countries on over the world should take responsibility in assistance of others countries. However some opponents contend that it is impossible to bring their financial funding to the disadvantaged regions. I am of opinion that supporting for others is of great necessary in general development on the world.
On the one hand, the number of reasons why mutually assistance among countries is essential job. The first prominent point is that the international support gain importance in addressing problems related to diseases, domestic war. It is supposed that some underdeveloped nations has suffered natural disasters or starvation. The instant actions from worldwide countries help disadvantaged countries to overcome difficulties, revive economic as well stabilize society. This means take steps in advance in prevention of expanding global recession. Another point to mention is that international aid enables to be closer and assist in difficult period of time. It is understandable that when recipient countries would have sense of solidarity. They may consider these nations as cooperation in the years ahead that is beneficial for both.
One the other hand, there is no denying that we are not accessible to remotes areas or disadvantaged regions for some following reasons. The vulnerable areas is home that money or materials aid do not come there due to obstacles in transportation or problems involved to religions or local regulations. The clearest example to explain this point is that some hurricanes cause devastating impacts to indigenous people in mountain areas. To supporting for this case, aid have to be given by planes or helicopters to come receivers. The second remarkable issue is that restricts in budget is one of the reason as why some disadvantaged areas is not affordable with adequate assistance. A large of number of poor people those need to be assisted. It is easily to note that some areas can lack of interested from international aid.
It seems to me that mutual assistance is an indispensable part in modern world towards better world. Meanwhile it is a challenging task in some circumstances.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-08-01 | Duuuuuuuuuu | 69 | view |
- Some people believe the purpose of education is to prepare people to be useful members for society. Others say that the purpose of education is to achieve personal ambitions. Discuss both opinions and give your own opinion. 73
- Some people believe countries have moral obligations to help each other others worry that the aid money cannot get to the poor of this world Discuss both sides and give your own opinion 69
- Some people think a job not only provides income but also social life Others think it is better to develop social life with people you do not work with Discuss both view 77
- Some people believe the purpose of education is to prepare people to be useful members for society Others say that the purpose of education is to achieve personal ambitions Discuss both opinions and give your own opinion 77
- Some people think it is more important to spend money on roads and motorways than on public transport systems. To what extend do you agree? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
It is true that globalization has made w...
^^^
Line 1, column 76, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...s made worldwide citizens to be closer. Therefore it is argued that countries on over the...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 194, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...lity in assistance of others countries. However some opponents contend that it is impos...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y in general development on the world. On the one hand, the number of reasons w...
^^^^
Line 2, column 646, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...es to be closer and assist in difficult period of time. It is understandable that when recipie...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ars ahead that is beneficial for both. One the other hand, there is no denying ...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of interested from international aid. It seems to me that mutual assistance is...
^^^^
Line 4, column 105, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Meanwhile,
...t in modern world towards better world. Meanwhile it is a challenging task in some circum...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, well, while, in general, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1883.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 355.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30422535211 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18881451146 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569014084507 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 603.9 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.1427015246 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 89.6666666667 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9047619048 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.95238095238 7.06120827912 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220887517951 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0559986926172 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0360533316353 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121538660077 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0354777219644 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.16 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.