Some people believe that developing countries should concentrate on improving industrial skills whereas others argue that these countries should promote education first. Discuss both viewpoints and give your own opinion.
People have different opinions as to whether developing nations should put their focus on enhancing industry-related skills or education. While I understand that the enhancement of working skills could be beneficial to some degree, I would contend that education should be seen as a number one priority.
On the one hand, there are some possible benefits of improving industrial skills. Firstly, developing economies have had trouble in the skills gap when plenty of manufacturers are unable to recruit sufficiently skilled employees. In Vietnam, for instance, there are merely a few workers capable of becoming a technician or engineer in electric and automatic engineering companies, which could severely affect economic growth. Besides, industrial skills training could also increase productivity since when staff has a well-rounded skill set, they are more likely to perform efficiently and effectively. As a result, more revenue would be created not only for the business but also for the whole nation.
However, I would argue that promoting education is the most effective pathway to success for developing nations. First and foremost, education is the optimal way to keep a high quality of human resources, which determine the future and survival of a country. Undoubtedly, no economies developed without having a host of intellects, such as scientists or experts in different areas. Another importance of a well-structured education is it promotes effective communication, allowing new ways to trade with other countries. Undeniably, healthy relationships are inevitable for the growth of a nation, and well-educated people are often able to communicate effectively and have more opportunities to interact with others across the globe. Therefore, investing more in the education system is crucial to strengthen the nation.
In conclusion, while working kills could bring some advantages, I reckon that emergent nations should pay more attention to enhancing education because of its benefits to the country’s development in the long run.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-14 | thanhlan0201 | 89 | view |
| 2019-08-13 | Duong Linh | 50 | view |
| 2019-08-06 | Duong Linh | 89 | view |
| 2019-08-06 | Duong Linh | 89 | view |
| 2019-01-10 | dqhungdl | 92 | view |
- Big salary is much more important than job satisfaction. Do you agree or disagree? 89
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation, such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money. Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations. 84
- The diagram below shows how coffee is produced and prepared for sale in supermarkets and shops. 61
- Some people believe that developing countries should concentrate on improving industrial skills whereas others argue that these countries should promote education first. Discuss both viewpoints and give your own opinion. 89
- Some people believe that developing countries should concentrate on improving industrial skills whereas others argue that these countries should promote education first. Discuss both viewpoints and give your own opinion. 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 32, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
People have different opinions as to whether developing nations should put their foc...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 137, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'skills'' or 'skill's'?
Suggestion: skills'; skill's
...oping economies have had trouble in the skills gap when plenty of manufacturers are un...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, however, if, so, then, therefore, well, while, as to, for instance, i reckon, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1752.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.65161290323 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20079984801 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609677419355 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 558.0 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4607862309 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.142857143 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1428571429 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6428571429 7.06120827912 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236107995812 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.076720191516 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.054083397997 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143347489565 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0416173987251 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.49 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.82 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.