Some people believe that the development of artificial intelligence will make human labour obsolete Others think that work performed by humans will always be important Discuss both these views and give your own opinion

Essay topics:

Some people believe that the development of artificial intelligence will make human labour obsolete. Others think that work performed by humans will always be important. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion

It's a common belief that many workers would lose their job because of the intelligence artificial. However, humans play an important role in many work fields that technology cannot even compare with.

On the one hand, technological development provides many machines that have the ability to perform much more effectively than humans. As a matter of fact, the automatic program provides a mechanical system that can work continuously and produce similar items which are just a few long-experienced laborers can perform. Therefore, by optimizing the process with automatic and modern machines, the company would be able to increase its income. Let's take Japan as an example, this is the country leading the tendency of robots such as for industry and daily life which already replaced a lot of employees. It's necessary to change humans with other artificial facilities because of their convenience and productivity.
Nevertheless, Humans play an indispensable part in the workforce. There are many positions that require the experience to solve problems and offer decisions that even artificial intelligence couldn't handle. For instance, in Korea, many hospitals are equipped with health care robots in order to serve the patients, but it's just assistant tools for nurses to have better performance. Moreover, modern machines require many strict conditions to have the best operation as inspection and maintenance regular, which cost a huge amount of money.
In conclusion, while modern technology tends to change the work market by replacing humans, it's undeniable that humans would never be completely replaced by anything

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-08-20 Diabolo 61 view
2020-10-08 Ngô Nguyễn Thanh Nhã 96 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: It's; It is
Its a common belief that many workers would...
^^^
Line 3, column 443, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...y would be able to increase its income. Lets take Japan as an example, this is the c...
^^^^
Line 4, column 191, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...sions that even artificial intelligence couldnt handle. For instance, in Korea, many ho...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 96, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the work market by replacing humans, its undeniable that humans would never be co...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, while, as for, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a matter of fact

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1378.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 251.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49003984064 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94863784945 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.617529880478 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.6165503128 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.833333333 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9166666667 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.75 7.06120827912 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120563194979 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0475401668942 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0387177372297 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0786146356884 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0197796382578 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.