Some people believe that developments in the field of artificial intelligence will have a positive impact on our lives in the near future Others by contrast are worried that we are not prepared for a world in which computers are more intelligent than huma

Due to the advancement in the field of artificial intelligence, there are an argument between some believe that AI will bring a range of benefits on our lives in the foreseeable future and the rest who concern about the world’s unpreparedness in which computers are smarter than humans. From my perspective, I totally agree with the first idea.

Having improved the efficiency of the work process is the most obvious thing. Since AI systems are unbound by human limitations and availability 24/7 as well as their ability to perform monotonous, time-consuming tasks that human could not find particularly enjoyable, it aims to increase the workflows. Moreover, AI can complete almost perfectly the process of analyzing massive amounts of data, finding the relevant information and offer recommendations based on the history in seconds that not only help this systems to eliminate the error rates to the lowest but also make an informed decision.

However, it is the major cause of the unemployment due to the reduction in the need for human interference. Because of AI’s ability to memorise and solve puzzles, the usage of brain has been decreased conspicuously which lead to people’s laziness and health issues. Despite the high price that can not be afforded, it lacks of focusing on the important matters. Moreover, the mistakes that are made by AI can cost everything even things that out of human control. Most importantly, if AI systems become smarter and grow uncontrollably, they can take control over human.

In conclusion, artificial intelligence was born as an assistant to help people tackle their problem. Since this systems have more advantages than its drawbacks, they should be used wisely.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., I totally agree with the first idea. Having improved the efficiency of the wo...
^^^
Line 3, column 508, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...e history in seconds that not only help this systems to eliminate the error rates to...
^^^^
Line 7, column 108, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...help people tackle their problem. Since this systems have more advantages than its d...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, second, so, well, in conclusion, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1447.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24275362319 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9980805839 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648550724638 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 78.7342135853 49.4020404114 159% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.583333333 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150555558586 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0470005567445 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0720648795392 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101720874599 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0849116272658 0.056905535591 149% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.