It is thought by some that some high-risk sports such as sky-diving as well as skiing can put their participants in a worrying hazard of losing their lives, therefore, it ought to be prohibited. To my perspective, while I partly support this assertion, I strongly believe that performing these sorts of risky sports with full alertness and high level of precaution can absolutely dilute almost all unpleasant dangers to a low percentage.
Some people hold this viewpoint that there is no necessity of doing hazardous sports on the account of some genuinely true causes such as the possibility of athletes' fatality. However clearly I am of the opinion that people who are in favor of doing these dangerous sports supposed to guard themselves from any potential dangers by getting full training and practicing so that they can be more confident in what they are doing with a low risk of encountering hazardous zones. Moreover, as an old saying goes better safe than sorry, I assume if some safety regulations will be deemed by sports organization, performing these aforementioned sports conspicuously meets a lower risk of unfavorable hazard.
Despite some safety zones which could be advanced by sports communities for a safe performance in challenging sports such as bungee jumping or rock climbing, I am a true follower of this truism that restricting doing something full of danger like these sports in order to be sound and safe does not really appeal to be a neat way of solving a difficulty. In other words, instead of banning something high-risk, international sports community could really take some productive actions and present some efficient solutions to this current problem. I would clear things up by illustrating a reliable instance of Australia, land of second to none champions and Olympians. In 1994, Australia unfortunately lost a great a number of their sky divers due to some malfunction parachutes besides incorrect routes to how to land on earth. Following this bitter happening, Australia's government launched a department with host number of sports experts working in to measure all risks of this sport with the intention of minimize all anticipated risks to almost zero. Consequently the proportion of athletes who have missed their lives or suffered from severe injuries, has witnessed a remarkable decline of 68 percent.
By way of conclusion, I do agree that there are some risky sports which can cost people's lives, nonetheless there are some countless of useful techniques which can be applied to increase the safety level of doing these sports.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 177, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...s the possibility of athletes fatality. However clearly I am of the opinion that people...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1056, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Consequently,
...e all anticipated risks to almost zero. Consequently the proportion of athletes who have mis...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, consequently, however, if, moreover, nonetheless, really, second, so, therefore, well, while, such as, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 41.998997996 155% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2168.0 1615.20841683 134% => OK
No of words: 420.0 315.596192385 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1619047619 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52701905584 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94434775009 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 176.041082164 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569047619048 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 665.1 506.74238477 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 20.2975951904 172% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.0181425069 49.4020404114 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 180.666666667 106.682146367 169% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.0 20.7667163134 169% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5 7.06120827912 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30850171141 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110600904238 0.084324248473 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0667102733655 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195802436109 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0329746221308 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.4 13.0946893788 156% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.95 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.9 11.3001002004 150% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.24 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 9.78957915832 194% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 10.1190380762 158% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 10.7795591182 176% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.