Some people believe famous people’s support towards international aid organizations draws attention to problems. Other thinks celebrities make the problems less important. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Some hold the perspective that famous people have a crucial role to play in attracting public’s attention to hot issues by supporting international aid organizations, while others suggest that celebrities merely make problems less significant than they in fact are. Though there are certainly valid arguments to the contrary, it is my personal belief that the impact of celebrities is generally positive.
Admittedly, the fact that every insignificant event in lives of celebrities nowadays makes front page headlines leads to people increasingly ignoring news about them. In reality, even an outrageous outfit worn by some idol could become the leading article of a newspaper; such trivia gives rise to people paying less and less attraction to news items about famous people. As well as this, yellow journalism has actually been notorious for the techniques they use when run stories about the showbiz which include exaggeration, scandal-mongering and sensationalism. Consequently, few people today trust the stories they hear about celebrities. The above-mentioned facts indicate that matters associated with superstars now capture less attention than they used to in the past. Even though famous people are in favor of any aid organizations or are showing support for some campaign, the public tend to doubt the real motives behind their actions and the reliability of the news.
On the other hand, I would contend that no one can deny celebrities’ powers of drawing attention and spreading news. In fact, the appearance of social networking sites such as Facebook, Instagram and Twitter has made great contribution to the reduction in the distance between famous people and their adorable fans. One particularly prominent example of this is that whenever Justin Bieber, a world-known pop singer, posts a photo on his Instagram account, it receives millions of likes and comments within hours. One further instance is that of Miley Cyrus, an American musician/singer, who made going vegan movements known to a great many people with a picture showing her new tattoo of a tree – the symbol of a plant-based lifestyle. Further and even more importantly, though, well-known entertainers and sports athletes are usually regarded as youngster’s role models. The younger generation are often keen on copying patterns of behavior from their idols. If an idol shows his/her sympathy for people in a disaster-stricken region, for instance, his/her fans are highly likely to do the same thing. Actually, thousands of talented actor Brad Pitt’s supporters have made huge donations to international philanthropic bodies that he has donated to.
By way of conclusion, despite some drawbacks to celebrities’ participation in global aid agencies, I am convinced that it is more advantageous for the society that they take part in voluntary activities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-07-24 | Jillianynb | 89 | view |
- As well as making money, businesses also have social responsibilities. Do you agree or disagree? 84
- Some people think that people who choose a job early and keep doing it are more likely to have a satisfying career life than those who frequently change jobs. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Some people believe that studying at university or college is the best route to a successful career, while other believe that it is better to get a job straight after school. Discuss both views. 89
- Cycling is more environmentally-friendly than other forms of transport. Why is it not popular in many places? How can its popularity be increased? 89
- New technologies have change the way children spend their free time. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, consequently, if, so, well, while, for instance, in fact, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2435.0 1615.20841683 151% => OK
No of words: 444.0 315.596192385 141% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48423423423 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5903493882 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23759126511 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 278.0 176.041082164 158% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626126126126 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 756.9 506.74238477 149% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.9647143624 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.235294118 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1176470588 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.52941176471 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273890216669 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0765142419167 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0745808198857 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165951270932 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0696784393284 0.056905535591 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.22 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 149.0 78.4519038076 190% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.