Some people believe that the government should not spend money on international aid when they have their own disadvantaged people like the homeless and unemployed. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Globalisation has become increasingly significant trend in recent decades. However, some individuals advocate the view that the authorities should not support other nations, while there are still homelessness and unemployment in their own countries. I somewhat agree with the viewpoint as these issues may have negative impacts on countries, even though aiding other nations may be beneficial for the donor nation.
The first point in support of prioritizing solving problems within countries before helping others is that it would reduce the risk of civil unrests and conflicts in each nation. This is because those who are unable to land a job or afford a house, are likely to feel desperate and finally get involved in alcohol, drug and anti-social acts. Therefore, high rate of unemployment and the homeless would exert a great burden on the economy, which subsequently results in social evils and other law breaking behaviors.
Another explaination for opposing assisitance to international support when nations having their own problems is that international support may require tremendous amount of resources, of which the donor country may not have. Some less developed nations, which do not have many priviledges such as natural resources or capital, could go so far to borrow money and resources from other parties, which is problematic and increase their chance of national bankruptcy.
Admittedly, there are still occasions when it is viable for less advantaged nations supporting others. After catastrophic events in certain countries, the need for food, medicines and medical workers are increased. Under these circumstances, countries can support each other by providing the necessities, which may not be expensive and rare in the donor nations. In addition to this, helping other countries also imply humanity and strengthen international solidarity, which eliminates misunderstanding between nations.
In sum, if poor countries support other nations, when they have their national issues, they would stand a higher chance of having national turmoils as well as exacerbate their own challenges. However, if nations are capable of assisting others, while maintain their autonomy, international aid can sometimes be supplied. I therefore somewhat concer with the overexploitation of national resources for help other nation, except for special situations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-20 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2023-06-20 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
- Some people think it is more important to spend money on roads and motorways than on public transport systems To what extend do you agree 78
- Some people think that staying in hotels is not a good option to know about a country or its people What do you think about this viewpoint 89
- Wild animals have no place in the 21st century so protecting them is a waste of resources To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- In many countries today if people want to find a job they have to move away from their friends and their families Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 64
- Many different countries have most shops and products that are the same Some people consider this to be a positive development while others think it is a negative development Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 503, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...arity, which eliminates misunderstanding between nations. In sum, if poor coun...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, if, may, so, still, then, therefore, well, while, except for, in addition, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2029.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 357.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.68347338936 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03178815897 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588235294118 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 621.9 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4424315986 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.266666667 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158885158051 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0546373067072 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0575303774029 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0962529283166 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0539083219098 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.96 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.82 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.