some people believe that government should spend money on building train and subway lines to reduce traffic congestion. Other think that building more wider roads is the better way to reduce traffic congestion.
There have been various controversial arguments surrounding addressing traffic problems. While there are some advocates of constructing more and broadening roads to solve this problem root and branch, I still believe that it is better to invest in the erection of rail and metro lines to alleviate traffic congestion.
On the one hand, there are obvious reasons why the construction and extension of roads can sort the congestion out. In contemporary settings, congestion remains problematic, places in danger of traffic jams tend to rise in densely populated regions, crucial traffic routes, primary axes in and out of metropolitan centers, and so on due to the massive number of traffic as well as the degraded condition of the road. This leads to the annoyance of residents and puts the authorities in a bind. Furthermore, the cost of building roads is substantially lower than that of constructing subway lines, the money saved may then be utilized to fund other critical areas such as healthcare and education.
On the other hand, I would side with those who think that investment in manufacturing subway systems is crucial. Numerous studies have consistently found that subway travel is exceedingly green since it does not emit harmful exhaust fumes into the atmosphere and helps to reduce noise pollution. For example, a study by three American environmentalists drew a conclusion that travel by public transportation produces, on average, about 45 percent less carbon dioxide and nitrogen oxide, per passenger mile than travel by private vehicles. In this way, subway transportation not only alleviates the current traveling overload but also safeguards the environment. Moreover, in densely populated areas, expanding and building more roads is a flight of fancy due to inadequate space, however, a subway network is built underground and there is no need to worry about scarcity of land, turning train and subway systems into the ideal solution.
In conclusion, although some people said it is more beneficial to build and extend roads in order to solve traffic congestion, I personally believe that government should invest in train and subway transportation instead.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-05-20 | vialia | 73 | view |
| 2022-03-29 | nguyenson@_@ | 89 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, may, moreover, so, still, then, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1840.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 344.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3488372093 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02774711113 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607558139535 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 567.0 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.700680113 49.4020404114 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.333333333 106.682146367 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.6666666667 20.7667163134 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0 7.06120827912 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.365484950132 0.244688304435 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102316347813 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0824776396555 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207704418983 0.151304729494 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0682123247538 0.056905535591 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.0946893788 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 50.2224549098 86% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.89 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.