Some people believe that international sporting events are the ideal opportunity to show the world the qualities of the hosting nation. Others, believe that these events are mainly a large unjustifiable expense. Discuss both points of view and give your own opinion.
Playing sports has always been related to competition, either are they individual or team sports, people - undoubtedly- have to compete to win. Surprisingly enough, the Olympics go back to thousands of years to ancient Greek times before being resurrected by the late 1890s - exactly by 1896. To have a part in the Olympics or any other sporting event, practitioners should meet specific requirements; besides, sharing in these events will then
has an exquisite advantage even though a minority assume that either hosting or sharing in them is both a waste of money and time.
In an era of technological encroachment, hosting these sporting events will definitely be of a great avail. If a certain country decides to announce that it will organize such an event, a myriad of sport-loving people will ineludibly buy tickets in order to travel to this country and attend such an eminent and intriguing event. Therefore, more people will visit this country; thus, more tourism and a inevitably a higher economical income caused by the
significant increase in the number of tourists (who will undeniably be curious enough to visit touristic places; for nothing but to satisfy their curiosity). Plus, the money gained from the advertising agents and of course the clubs. Not only will hosting these events contributes to a conspicuous increase in the economical income and popularity, but it will also lead the citizens to have an increased sense of patriotism. Proud to see their country in the international headlines, they will have a higher sense of satisfaction of belonging to this country; especially if it wins.
On the flipside, however, a small group of people -insignificantly- presume that hosting these events conduces to a tremendous waste of funds and that allocating these funds to other beneficial things would be much more substantial; such as, spending it to enhance the infrastructure or even to help the plethora of people who are under the poverty line. Nevertheless, the aforementioned assumptions seem to be untenable. By increasing the social income and tourism the countries can then be able to build new streets, schools, and even help poor people, not to mention the fact that by a drastic rise in the tourism, there will be more jobs available for the unemployed poor people. Hence, they will gain more money which will boost their living standard.
To conclude, despite the small amount of people who relinquish the idea of the sporting events, an array of advocates assert that they have numerous privileges. In my own perspective, it is quite explicit that some developing countries need to be spending money on improving its infrastructure and offering opportunities for people to work and gain money; nonetheless, if they spent funds on those events they will gain money on the log run; to be used to improve the country's situations and conditions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-05-06 | Farah-Hassann | 73 | view |
| 2022-05-06 | Farah-Hassann | 73 | view |
| 2022-05-06 | Farah-Hassann | 73 | view |
| 2021-10-13 | iambest | 84 | view |
| 2021-10-12 | iambest | 84 | view |
- Homeschooling 11
- homeschooling 11
- Some people believe that international sporting events are the ideal opportunity to show the world the qualities of the hosting nation Others believe that these events are mainly a large unjustifiable expense Discuss both points of view and give your own 73
- homeschooling 11
- homeschooling 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 402, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...it this country; thus, more tourism and a inevitably a higher economical income c...
^
Line 5, column 247, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'host'
Suggestion: host
... and of course the clubs. Not only will hosting these events contributes to a conspicuo...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, however, if, nevertheless, nonetheless, so, then, therefore, thus, of course, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 66.0 41.998997996 157% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2416.0 1615.20841683 150% => OK
No of words: 471.0 315.596192385 149% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12951167728 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65859790218 4.20363070211 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96933237846 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 247.0 176.041082164 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524416135881 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 751.5 506.74238477 148% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 31.0 20.2975951904 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 92.4847134516 49.4020404114 187% => OK
Chars per sentence: 161.066666667 106.682146367 151% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.4 20.7667163134 151% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46666666667 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148555399014 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0533000997622 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0533138773291 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.083661820871 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0304565537307 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 13.0946893788 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 50.2224549098 80% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.07 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 78.4519038076 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.1190380762 142% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.