Some people believe that the Internet brings people of different ages and cultures together. To what extent do you agree with this opinion?
It is widely believed that as electronic devices became more advanced, people began to communicate more over the internet, bringing them closer together. On the contrary, there is a certain group of people who believe that the Internet has pushed people far apart. Before coming to a logical conclusion, we'll look at both sides and I will explain further in this essay.
To begin with, we must acknowledge how technological advancements have altered the whole world and brought individuals from all over the planet together with a single touch. In the past, sending a message to another location would take a long time, or you could have to go to their location to give the message, which was inefficient and time-consuming. Now, we just engage with each other, and the message is sent to their side in a second. Consequently, People, particularly adolescents, begin enjoy conversing through numerous online sites as technology progresses at a breakneck rate, because it helps them to keep in touch with their distant relatives and friends. For example, Facebook, a widely used social networking site, has millions of members who connect with one another on a regular basis, sharing their thoughts on a variety of issues and forming communities with others who have shared interests.
On the other hand, while the Internet connects people digitally, it isolates them socially in the meantime, because the more time they spend online, the less time they spend engaging in real life. People who are hooked to the internet and can't get away from their devices will not develop any social skills or gain any knowledge that’s essential for their lives. This is a major disadvantage since it will put them in perplexing situations that they won't know how to handle. Many people assume that technological communication is less comprehensive and trustworthy than communication done by face-to-face conversation or over the phone. Social connections are built on the facades of other internet users, whose anonymous activities might be deceptive and unpredictable.
To sum up, despite all of this, I continue to notice flaws in the evolution of interface technologies since there is an enormous amount of time each person spends on the Internet and separates from each other. But we can’t forget to mention the contributions that technology has made to human contact, and I believe that the mentioned flaw is easily remedied.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 240, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ople who are hooked to the internet and cant get away from their devices will not de...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, if, look, second, so, well, while, for example, on the contrary, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2040.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 394.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17766497462 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45527027702 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87850381714 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 176.041082164 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596446700508 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 648.9 506.74238477 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.5079768132 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.0 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2666666667 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.46666666667 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185236985226 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.062640912577 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0552707572823 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115528285704 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0674251865997 0.056905535591 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.