Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as unsatifactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both views and give your opinion

Personalities differ in how they react to a bad situation; some just accept their fate and others believe that they have to make it better. This essay will discuss both ends of the argument in depth.

Some people when faced with a difficult situation in their life tend to accept it. They do not do it because of a lack of strength, however, they think that accepting fate is part of life’s journey. For example, if someone had an accident that totaled his car, he would think of it as an act of fate that could not be avoided. Moreover, he would try to find positive experience in such a horrific event and he might start learning to enjoy every day of his life.

On the other end of the argument, some people argue that we should always try to improve our life. No matter what hardship we find ourselves in, we should always try to find a better place to be. For example, someone might find himself in a job that does not suit his capabilities. In such a situation, he might think of other options including starting his own private business where he can employ his talents in the best way. Overall, this group will always try to find a path of change in any situation to make it better.

In my opinion, life is very complex and you cannot face it with the same attitude. Depending on the situation that we are facing, we should choose the correct path of action.

To conclude, we should evaluate each situation we face in our lives and react to it based on the best outcome that is expected from it. As in some situations, we might accept and just go with the flow, however in other situations, we might need to stand up and face it and try your best to change it.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (2 votes)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, so, for example, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 24.0651302605 216% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1369.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.37380191693 5.12529762239 85% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32530800851 2.80592935109 83% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507987220447 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 424.8 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.5901303872 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.2666666667 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8666666667 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.53333333333 7.06120827912 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245005139965 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0797184320553 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0526673826919 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12709518502 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0431482655164 0.056905535591 76% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.0946893788 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 50.2224549098 136% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.07 12.4159519038 65% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.95 8.58950901804 81% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 78.4519038076 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, so, for example, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 24.0651302605 216% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1369.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.37380191693 5.12529762239 85% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32530800851 2.80592935109 83% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507987220447 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 424.8 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.5901303872 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.2666666667 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8666666667 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.53333333333 7.06120827912 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245005139965 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0797184320553 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0526673826919 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12709518502 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0431482655164 0.056905535591 76% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.0946893788 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 50.2224549098 136% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.07 12.4159519038 65% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.95 8.58950901804 81% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 78.4519038076 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.