Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion
Over the last century, the word has been facing a tremendous increase in the number of information in all fields such as science and business. People have different views about whether or not this data should be shared freely. In this essay, I will negotiate both views and state my own opinion.
On the one hand, several people claim that a plethora of information ought to be open freely to society. The strongest argument that it provides us with up-to-date information regarding medical achievements and the development of technologies that could facilitate our day-to-day lives. For example, researchers may reach faster outstanding results by sharing knowledge in between namely the evolution of new cancer drugs or stem cells. In the same way, the new technologies like internet broaden people’s cognition about other cultures, cuisines and geographic features of lands. it means that the vast majority of people may learn new thing at home without wasting money only by surfacing on the internet.
On the other hand, several people suppose that some information should not be available for everyone that might be dangerous for folks if this data reveals. First of all, information regarding the technologies of weapons or nuclear science, which could be used against inhabitants. For example, if this data had uncovered for terrorists, it might lead to wars or terrorist attacks. Moreover, information concerning companies’ secrets namely algorithms and protocols have to be kept confidential trying to maintain a competitive edge or safeguard new discoveries over other companies.
In conclusion, for the reasons mentioned above, I believe that some information is overmuch sensitive and confidential and cannot be revealed to everyone.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-06 | Sheetal Bataniya | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-23 | lipsa pipaliya | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-23 | lipsa pipaliya | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-07 | tamimadnan6240 | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-03 | kuldeep sharma | 93 | view |
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in English who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010. 73
- In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.Discuss both th 78
- Archaeologists have recently found a fossil of a 150-million-year-old mammalknown as Repenornamus robustus (R. robustus). Interestingly, the mammal'sstomach contained the remains of a psittacosaur dinosaur. Some researchers havetherefore suggested th 3
- Given two bar chart shows destination of undergraduates and postgraduates student of the UK,other than full-time work in the year of 2008. 61
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these cause affected three regions of the world during the 1990s. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 178, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...ness. People have different views about whether or not this data should be shared freely. In t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 587, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...sines and geographic features of lands. it means that the vast majority of people ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, for example, in conclusion, such as, first of all, in the same way, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1492.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4652014652 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02647462109 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622710622711 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.218370472 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.769230769 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.69230769231 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227456268957 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0768085132133 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0540074154257 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140968716752 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.023009825869 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.