In recent years, there have been two conflicting views on the extent to which information should be kept confidential. Some people insist that in this democratic era, more information related to science, business and academia should be made readily accessible to the public. However, others feel the need to restrict public access to certain important or valuable data. In my opinion, I concur with the first point of view, for people would derive considerable benefit from information sharing.
On the one hand, opponents of data sharing contend that unrestricted circulation of information poses a serious threat to national security. For example, if people can access the confidential information about how to develop nuclear power or missiles, the safety of many countries will be jeopardized. There are fears that these weapons might fall into the wrong hands of terrorists, and as such they will be equipped with the knowledge to create weapons of mass destruction to carry out brutal massacres on a large scale. Given the drawback of data sharing, some people believe that critically important information should not be circulated without rigorous protection plans.
On the other hand, those who advocate information transparency suggest that information sharing could advance the scientific and technological development. For instance, if Apple Inc. had kept its technical data confidential, the revolution of mobile phones could not have been carried out because most Asian manufacturers would have encountered technical barriers to create a much more innovative product. Considering the aforementioned advantage, some people consider it reasonable to allow more data sharing.
In conclusion, people have different perspectives on how much information could be available to the public. Some fear that unlimited access to information might bring about a crisis of national security. Nevertheless, I think that information sharing can bring considerable benefits to human world as long as it is properly managed.
- Some people say that playing computer games is bad for children in every way. Others say that playing computer games can have positive effects on the way children develop 84
- Some people like to spend their money as soon as they earn it while others think it is better to save their money for some time in the future Which do you prefer Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 95
- Some countries achieve international sports by building specialized facilities to train top athletes instead of providing sports facilities that everyone can use Do you think this is positive or negative development 84
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement These days children spend more time on doing homework or participating in organized activities related to school or sports However they should be given more time to do whatever they want 70
- All the people in a company should be treated equally and provided with the same number of vacations in a year To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, nevertheless, so, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1716.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58957654723 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06139368087 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596091205212 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 540.0 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.3861676957 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.4 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4666666667 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.06666666667 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.310826321057 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10249343788 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0653014964341 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190655336541 0.151304729494 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0299952549725 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.