Nearly all accomplished scientific researches are expected to be result in one or more academic publications or technical reports. The problem is that somebodies hold this opinion that these findings not to get publicized, however, the rest of people disagree. In following paragraphs I will elaborate on my own viewpoint which is a positive approach to this issue.
The first reason is that distribution of scientific researches is a part of academic contracts of grants and programs. To be exact, in researches such as Ph.D. projects the student (main researcher) have a commitment to come up with some published results in forms of formula, chart, model, designs, and so on, and these are what she or he is paid for.
Second, there is an ethical manner and unwritten rule between almost all people to exchange their ideas or information. Similarly, regardless of field or domain, scholars are ought to be such open-minded to distribute their findings. That would be totally beneficial because can bring new inspiration, synergy or insights for solving scientific problem solving, or even lead to a unexplored research questions. Exchanging researchers information such as background, former experiences, affiliation, and name, from another side, might provide the opportunity of getting offers for further collaborated research job.
The next advantage of sharing information is that, the more valuable knowledge you share, the more developed community you probably have. It is deniable that widely sharing science can help to have a more intelligent generation and society.
In sum, information sharing can be helpful specifically for our global scientific community due to its positive impacts.
- the bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity. in 2010(Cambridge Academic 12). 84
- Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?-Interrupt and correct the mistake right away-Wa 76
- TPO-48 - Integrated Writing Task 76
- TPO 45- In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives 81
- TPO 46- The opinion of celebrities, such as famous entertainers and athletes, are more important to younger people than they are older people. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 378, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ntific problem solving, or even lead to a unexplored research questions. Exchangi...
^
Line 3, column 378, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'unexplored research'.
Suggestion: unexplored research
...ntific problem solving, or even lead to a unexplored research questions. Exchanging researchers infor...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, similarly, so, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1438.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44696969697 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07862047684 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.655303030303 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.337923461 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.833333333 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.58333333333 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212189297234 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0688103607059 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0422019823554 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111703459226 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0227928340234 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.