In recent times one of the most debated issues relates to data sharing. Some people assert that scientific, technical, and business information should be shared freely, while the others contend that it is better to keep some information confidential. However I strongly believe that both approaches have their own importance.
On the one side of the argument there are people who reason that sharing these types of information is important. Firstly, we live in an age where new inventions happen almost every single day. Sharing this type of information is important because it helps us to keep updated with the new inventions happening around us. Also, these researches are useful for further development, which can be used by people to ease their lives and for the betterment of the society. For instance, the invention of stem cell therapy pushed boundaries of medical science. By using stem cells in laboratories, we can create any organ we want. Secondly, sharing such information related to the financial growth of company should also helpful for the investors, who poured their money for smooth running of organisation's operation. To illustrate, in India, most of the listed companies send their annual report to their shareholder, through which they tried to share as much information as possible to their investors.
On the other hand, the group believes that sharing too much information can be dangerous. According to them, research related to weapons and nuclear science is extremely sensitive and confidential. If it falls into wrong hands, it can leads to wars or promote terror-related activities. Further, a few of many companies have a unique specialty in their products, which is called "USP". To stay in a competition and maintain higher market share, it is important for them to provide safeguards to protect their algorithm. To exemplify, Apple, a well-known brand and market leader in the smartphone industry, have USP related to safety of user's data. Due to this mastery, most of the business persons used this company's cell phone to keep their data safe.
To conclude, it is extremely important for the world to share knowledge regarding science, technology and business, but it is equally crucial to safeguard the information that is sensitive to companies and the country.
- People living in 21st century generally have better quality life than people born in earlier centuries To what extent do you agree or disagree 11
- Some people believe that allowing children to make their own choices on everyday matters such as food clothes and entertainment is likely to result in a society of individuals who only think about their own wishes Other people believe that it is important 73
- The maps below show the changes that have been taken place in Meadowside village and Fonton a neighbouring town since 1962 49
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourists facilities.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make Has this become a positive or negative development 78
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 252, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... to keep some information confidential. However I strongly believe that both approaches...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 134, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mation is important. Firstly, we live in an age where new inventions happen almos...
^^
Line 5, column 236, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'lead'
Suggestion: lead
...l. If it falls into wrong hands, it can leads to wars or promote terror-related activ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, well, while, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1947.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 371.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24797843666 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92343875266 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576819407008 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 605.7 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9397568074 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.473684211 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5263157895 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.15789473684 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260839800634 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0786952904036 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102309362708 0.0667982634062 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17237044988 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.060865552578 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 252, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... to keep some information confidential. However I strongly believe that both approaches...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 134, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mation is important. Firstly, we live in an age where new inventions happen almos...
^^
Line 5, column 236, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'lead'
Suggestion: lead
...l. If it falls into wrong hands, it can leads to wars or promote terror-related activ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, well, while, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1947.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 371.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24797843666 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92343875266 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576819407008 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 605.7 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9397568074 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.473684211 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5263157895 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.15789473684 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260839800634 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0786952904036 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102309362708 0.0667982634062 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17237044988 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.060865552578 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.