Due to significant progress in science and technology, modern people have more information and are more convenient to share than ever before.
Some people suggest that certain kinds of information should be given access to the public to the most extent. For example, information about scientific research, business and the academic world. Firstly, this could greatly reduce money spent on the same task and enhance collaboration across the world. Secondly, limited information makes it possible to fake news, wrong numbers and so on. There does not exist a lie that could match all aspects.
However, not all people agree with the above. They claim that sharing some information would sacrifice something important or valuable. For a country, some business data is such an important fundamental basis to national financial system that should be strictly confidential. For a company and individuals, free sharing of knowledge might deprive of the opportunity to benefit commercially from their hard working.
In my opinion, for many years we have benefited the advantages of the free flow of information, especially via the Internet. It only takes a few seconds to get the latest scientific research from the other side of the earth. With the help of digital libraries, students could finish a paper without stepping out of their rooms. For these reasons above, I do approve sharing information as much as possible except the type of information that has negative influence on public interests or legal rights of individuals. By this way, we can achieve all the benefits of sharing information and get rid of its shortcomings.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, for example, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1374.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26436781609 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85978305057 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.647509578544 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 424.8 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.5218771216 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.6 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.13333333333 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303761575969 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0918587389927 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0771317572595 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168813189544 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0409604603226 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.