Knowledge is the most powerful tool in hands of mankind, thus the access to this knowledge remains the main issue of many debates. While some people claim that particular information should be restricted to share in order to maintain global peace and preserve the value of information, their opponents support the idea of open access to the information in certain fields. Both opinions have positive and negative aspects and from my perspective, free access to information in research area, business and academic field can bring a considerable number of benefits.
To begin with, widely available information may fall into wrong hands, therefore, lead to adverse results. Consequences of using information with misguided intentions can threaten the security of individuals and big nations as well. Significant information that can effect state security, induce conflict between political powers, hand over severe technologies to terrorist groups should be analysed thoroughly before being spread. For instance, if nuclear technology is shared globally for scientific research and not used with peaceful purposes, the world would witness revolt and destruction.
On the other hand, future progress depends on new inventions and advanced technologies. In scientific world trustworthy and reliable sources of information have its own value. Without free access to previous findings and discoveries, researchers and scholars could not advance existing technologies and improve human's life. To illustrate, if discoveries in medicine and healthcare were not shared people in developing countries would still struggle with severe illnesses and lack of qualitative treatment.
To conclude with, information in hands of great minds can facilitate global progress and make breakthroughs that world demands. However, valuable information should be used only for peace and bright future of mankind.
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much as information as possible in scientific research, business and academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too invaluable to be shared freely.Discuss both views and five yo 75
- The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 40
- The chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate fast food in restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 78
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste 55
- In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transportDisucss both the 95
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, so, still, therefore, thus, well, while, for instance, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1617.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.79569892473 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96329727948 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648745519713 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3207239522 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.384615385 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4615384615 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07692307692 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219905633193 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.071614504805 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0463639497781 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129377439918 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0295268696258 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.36 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.0 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.