Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement ? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Some are of the opinion that in the 21st-century people have many variants and choice for different types of goods and other services. I strongly support this argument to a large extent and my reasons are explained in pursuing a write-up.
There are many reasons to support the above statement.The chief one is many countries and cities have technology. With the help of technology any nation can pioneer new goods and resources which are necessary for their native citizens for survival as well as comfort. For instance, many developing nations such as China and India have various type of new technology to produce different types of product which are similar in basic content but different in price, package and quality of product.
In addition, the second most important factor is " Globalization ". It is provide wide platform for many nations to reach on one place and to sell and buy products through import-export business and provide different types of goods , products , services and even share new technology and tech-no-savy products for certain individuals of cities. Thus, dwellers can take advantage of goods and choice as per their budget.
However, some counter claim that for certain services they can not find other option to choose. To explain this, in many places and countries certain group or authority have monopoly for their goods and services . So people must have to utilise that service instead of any other choice. To illustrate, India is a country where native citizens have only one option for train services. And it is generally accepted that government public transport system is very poor most of the time. So indian people do not have any other option still today.
To conclude, with the help of technology and globalizATION people have many options to choose instead of only one example of Indian's railway service.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-12 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-09-07 | Tuan Harry | 78 | view |
| 2024-05-07 | 123456abcxyz | 78 | view |
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 55, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
... reasons to support the above statement.The chief one is many countries and cities ...
^^^
Line 5, column 85, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'provided'.
Suggestion: provided
...r is ' Globalization '. It is provide wide platform for many nations to reach...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 242, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ess and provide different types of goods , products , services and even share new ...
^^
Line 5, column 253, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...vide different types of goods , products , services and even share new technology ...
^^
Line 7, column 212, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ve monopoly for their goods and services . So people must have to utilise that ser...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, second, so, still, thus, well, for instance, in addition, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1565.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13114754098 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62402549195 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527868852459 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 496.8 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.5513683591 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.333333333 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195943471132 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0740384898054 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0462322842806 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121301697267 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0433975041917 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 55, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
... reasons to support the above statement.The chief one is many countries and cities ...
^^^
Line 5, column 85, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'provided'.
Suggestion: provided
...r is ' Globalization '. It is provide wide platform for many nations to reach...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 242, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ess and provide different types of goods , products , services and even share new ...
^^
Line 5, column 253, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...vide different types of goods , products , services and even share new technology ...
^^
Line 7, column 212, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ve monopoly for their goods and services . So people must have to utilise that ser...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, second, so, still, thus, well, for instance, in addition, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1565.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13114754098 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62402549195 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527868852459 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 496.8 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.5513683591 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.333333333 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195943471132 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0740384898054 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0462322842806 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121301697267 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0433975041917 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.